Posted on 05/19/2021 10:50:16 AM PDT by absalom01
“A big part of the early opposition was certainly anti-Trumpism, but the continued resistance, in the face of now overwhelming evidence requires additional explanations.”
The explanation is very clear. You cannot get eua (emergency use authorization) approval unless there is no effective existing treatment.
Pharma and public health organizations (now heavily controlled by pharma) wanted vaccine eua. “Determining” that hydroxychloroquine and/or Ivermectin were “dangerous” and/or “ineffective” allowed them to get the covid vaccine eua.
As a direct result, Goa has seen a drop in cases from 3,124 the day after the announcement to 1,314 five days later.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pretty impressive. I do wonder what the trend line looked like prior to the announcement. And I wonder what other possible causes may have been in play during that time. But it wouldn’t surprise me if Ivermectin were the cause, especially since Goa is giving it early—in fact preemptively—which seems to be how it works best.
I’ve been on it since around Christmas. All good so far.
If you used early on HCQ, Ivermectin, and the plasma replacement treatment that has been used for several months now and the deaths caused by Covid would be miniscule and comparable to a normal flu season...
Ivermectin a blockbuster drug wherever it’s been tried. But Herr Fauci will have none of it in America.
I’ve a friend that is a lung M.D.....He started using IVERMECTIN..when it was approved...weeks ago.
Of course the elites have access to Ivermectin and will use it if they get COVID.
IMO, if the USA would have started this pandemic by using HCQ and Ivermectin and counted deaths from Covid, the real number would have been far less than a normal flu season...we probably would not have had a pandemic to begin with...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Agree. There was no pandemic. They manufactured it.
The PCR test does not identify the presence of the Covid virus nor does it identify the disease. So people with flu or other respiratory illnesses were lumped in together with those who had the specific Covid Coronavirus, diagnosed as Covid - and then ALL were denied medications.
https://i.imgflip.com/57x2j2.jpg
Dr. McCullough, when testifying before the Texas Senate, appeared to get choked up when relaying how patients felt being told to go home, without treatment, and return when they needed hospitalization.
He was among those doctors who realized the CDC was not going to pursue any medication protocol, and so he and a team of doctors dedicated their practice to coming up with one. Their protocol cuts the risk of dying among the most vulnerable (comorbidities+age) by 85%. The thread I'll link has the information on his protocol along with those of many others successfully treating Covid.
It was known at the time that once so severely ill ventilators were needed, there was little hope of recovery. At some point, physicians decided that World Health Organization recommendations for ventilators were 'too agressive' and damaging diseased lungs. The switch to less aggressive repiratory therapy (oxygen mask) saved some lives.
The CDC/Fauci denied the dying the right to even try FDA approved medications proven safe and well tolerated for decades. HCQ has been used for about 60 years for chronic illness (Lupus) and no one denied those drugs to those patients, and lupus patients can STILL get them.
The CDC/Fauci/NIH are murderers. Denying medications helped them meet the two criteria they needed to 'prove' which were requirements of the EUA for their fake 'vaccines'. They needed to prove 1) it was an emergency (people dying) and 2) there were no other effective treatments.
Further, on May 5th, the CDC quietly updated it's statistics. They've admitted now that only 5% of all Covid-19 deaths were persons who died from Covid alone (no other diagnoses). The other 95% of deaths from Covid were patients with an average of 4 comorbidities (hint: they didn't die of Covid).
Even then we can't be sure who among those 5% of deaths had Covid vs other respiratory diseases because the PCR test has a 97% false positive rate for 2020. After vaccines were released, the CDC lowered the cycle rate of the tests to lower the false postive rate. This whole thing is a scam.
All of us have that here, we need to deworm our horses heh.
Just because you took a poisonous shot that will end your life soon, doesn’t mean you need to be so bitter about it and keep posting. You decided to do it. Nobody made you. Coward.
I meant hugely successful drug, not a revenue generator.
There are plenty of RCT’s.
Just not in the US or the EU, but IMHO, that’s a strawman that the NIH is using at this point.
“Of course the elites have access to Ivermectin and will use it if they get COVID.”
I’ve thought for a long time that the Democrats were on Ivermectin, which is why very few got sick, while the Republicans were not on Ivermectin.
Almost like .... Trump was right.
Been saying that alot of late.
Lets examine your response in the spirit of socratic method and debate....Poisonous shot -- please help define poison. The vaccines are mRNA platforms, there is naturally occurring mRNA in every cell in the human body, can you please elucidate therefore how this is "poison" (This would satisfy the pillar of intelligence)
Will end your life soon -- it appears that this poster has had the vaccination for at least several months by way of the posting history. On what evidence do you stand that "it will end your life soon". Further, is this not hoping or wishing for fatality so that your point may be proven? This goes to the pillar of good will
Coward -- on what basis should this poster be called a coward. Seems to me he or she made a decision best in interest with the known risks / benefits / and alternatives. In what way is this cowardly (candor)
Judging my past data of your posting history, I do not expect an answer, or if you do proffer an answer, I expect it will likely be highly emotion, and devoid of actual argument much like the post you made that I am responding to is equally as devoid as logic, intellect, candor, and good will.
Used it from January through March, as I had a fair bit of exposure to the general public, and I know that I was exposed for certain on at least two occasions by coworkers. Didn’t get sick, and no side effects.
I chose to get the vax when it was offered at work, but kept some ivm on hand just in case.
“that’s a strawman that the NIH is using at this point”
Totally agree. The NIH is discounting any study done outside a “first world” nation. There are lots of studies from Iran, Pakistan, Peru, the Philippines, and other nations.
It’s all about “regulatory capture” by Big Pharma.
Well, credibility of the source can be important, but it seems that this report is accurate. Being alert to confirmation bias is important as well, but there seems to be a mountain of evidence piling up.
There is a narrative that tries to posit a false competition between existing therapeutics and vaccinations, which I reject, though the discussion surrounding the ‘EUA’ may cloud that issue somewhat. But as a practical matter, it would be best if we had both available.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.