U.S. Supreme Court hands victory to immigrants facing deportation

Reuters ^ | 04/29/2021 | Andrew Chung

[Olog-hai]

“Federal law” is not the Constitution, but the Constitution is federal law. Hence, there can be federal law that is un-Constitutional. And if the judgment is in favor of a standing un-Constitutional federal law that is on the books but not struck down due to judicial activism, that has everything to do with the Constitution particularly when the Constitution is deliberately ignored.

[Starboard]

SCOTUS = Swamp Court of the United States

[Savage Beast]

“Morality, like a chameleon, tends to take on the color of the circumambient society.”
Paramahansa Yogananda

An example is the justices of the Supreme Court, whose circumambient society today is sick with the decadence of Western Civilisation.

In 1857, the Supreme Court justices allowed themselves to be similarly influenced by the circumambient society, and the infamous Dred Scott decision was the result.

[Starboard]

We’re not in Kansas anymore, Toto.

*************

That’s for sure. Our once great country has turned into a corrupt and dysfunctional mess.

[southernindymom]

Boy that’s the truth

[Brilliant]

The Feinstein bill that created these procedural hurdles has got to be repealed and replaced with a rule that they can be deported without any process as long as there is no court issued writ of habeas corpus.

[ctdonath2]

The exact law in question specified how a court communicates with a defendant. The issue is not related to immigration status (his immigration status was the subject of the court case in which the court was failing to adhere to law specifying how the court was to communicate with him).

[billyboy15]

Thank you.

What should be noted is we stand for the rule of law as it is written and applies to our Constitution and not something which can be bent, twisted or ignored depending on the subject matter to which it is being applied or the outcome we desire.

[Olog-hai]

How Constitutional is that law?

[antidemoncrat]

SCOTUS = Supreme Clowns of the United States

[caww]

That this matter for illegals even made it to be heard by the Supreme Court is appalling when voters/citizens were denied such over a contested Presidential Election..

[fatman6502002]

That’s absolutely correct. The article makes it very clear.

[fatman6502002]

You don’t have a clue. Go back to DU where you belong.

[fatman6502002]

You are really dumb.

[AndyJackson]

Can’t prosecute me for bank robbery because I have been robbing banks for years...

[lodi90]

This should be a seen as a victory for conservatism, even if the result is undesirable.

---

LOL. No such thing exists. There are no moral victories to be had when facing a one party fascist government.

[Olog-hai]

Ah, so the Constitution means nothing to you, but “written law”? The only conclusion from that is that “gun control” laws in addition to “immigration laws” are Constitutional merely due to the fact that they were “written”.

BTW, your ad hominem response indicates that perhaps you are the DU denizen. A real FReeper (with all due respect) would educate me in where I am allegedly “wrong” and how my defense of the Constitution could possibly in any way be against the Constitution.

[ConservativeMind]

Thomas is rock solid, folks. This must valid a valid nuance for him to side with the liberals.

[Olog-hai]

Opusing?

[lodi90]

It’s still frustrating, and results in more illegals.

---

Note Gorsuch never strikes these poses when it might cause him to draw serious fire from the left. He’s as big a fraud as Roberts in my book.