Posted on 04/21/2021 4:50:43 AM PDT by Old Yeller
Who’s the steroid taking, aloof loner
That is actually very good
Good? What the hell is GOOD about that?
“we’ll get to relive all of this all over again.”
Shame on the writer. That’s a redundancy.
The beast doesn’t starve. Usually you starve before the beast. Considering how on-the-teat is most of America, the chances of making even a 3% dent in “the beast’s” revenue are very slim.
They can’t force you to work, yet.
Not once did the article state the name of the person who slaughtered Ashli Babbitt. A pure lack of journalistic integrity.
Under $12k a year your income isn’t enough to require filing a return. Nobody starves on $12k a year. In fact you get lots of perks that way. Free phone, free heat, free food...for now.
And you never know what you can accomplish if you don’t ever start.
Beats a shooting war that would never happen anyway, but if it did, it’d be over in 24hrs.
“The OJ jury is now in charge of the courts, the rule of law is out the window.”
It is so egregious that I have come to believe that in order to save community property and lives during one of these Lynch mob trials that the police officer charged should always be judged guilty to somewhat calm the flames and then, once the media and political assassins like Maxine Waters and Sharpton have moved on, give that officer witness protection and hide him and his family away forever. He won’t have a life anyway even if exonerated.
It makes a martyr of the police officer accepting the guilty verdict for the lives saved from street riots. I already believe juries in fear of their lives and fear of reprisals against their fellow citizens are handing out OJ verdicts for that reason alone.
Of course, there are always exceptions, and the Chauvin case may be one of them, but I am tired of these show trials of police officers. Already some communities are taking away liability protection from police officers.
Amen!
And even then......
My bad. It has been alleged in some reports that Chauvin may not have been “clean” but not in the Mail article.
The Mail describes him as a 4pm-2am beat cop with 2 medals for valor but also a string of complaints against him; who was ‘nice’ but didn’t socialize; and who allegedly overreacted from time to time when dealing with Blacks and Latinos whole working at the Rodeo nightclub (where Floyd had also worked). The incident with the lactating mother resulted in a formal disciplinary.
Much of it is anecdotal. But it shows he had a good side and a not so good side.
If we had the same level of information about the Babbit shooter, we wouldn’t dismiss such a report as a baseless hatchet job, we’d probably say it vindicates our suspicions.
The problem with refusing to acknowledge evidence we don’t want to hear is, it creates people like Jimmy Savile.
Jimmy Savile was a famous charity fundraiser, DJ, marathon runner, child safety campaigner and national treasure in the UK... As well as being a psychotic thug, a necrophiliac and a serial child molester. Who’d creep into children’s wards in hospitals and abuse the kids.
He was once caught out on live BBC TV prime time groping a young girl while presenting Top of the Pops. Practically everybody in authority who saw him doing it buried the story. Only an old punk singer had the guts to tell it like it really was.
There’s a book called “stranger danger” which is all about how to protect your kids from middle aged sex predators, and guess which necrophiliac pederast and celebrated child safety campaigner wrote it.
Savile knew he was untouchable and do did his creepy sex pesting right out in the open knowing there’d be always an army of people who had him on a pedestal, who’d simply look for alternative facts so they could keep in pretending he was always innocent.
If you ever want to know what “being on the wrong side of history” looks like, ask anyone who spent 20 years shouting “fake news!” every time somebody hinted at the possibility that Savile might be a bit of a deviant.
Political and ethnic considerations played a roll.
That isn’t justice it’s a lynching Judge Roy Bean approved.
“The beast has armed law enforcers on their side.”
Right! But I’d edit it to state, “The beast has armed enforcers on their side.” No law is involved.
Pelosi is protecting the murderer which makes her an accessory to murder.
Good post; insightful - thanks
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.