Mike Lindell: 19 Cyber Attacks From China Flipped 5 States To Biden

https://thepalmierireport.com/lindell-19-cyber-attacks-from-china-flipped-5-states-to-biden/ ^ | April 9, 2021 | Jacob Palmieri

[Dr. Franklin]

Lol, looks like you’ve got yourself banned again.

That is certainly not the only troll who shows up on these threads. Others are a bit more skillful, perhaps.

[DoodleDawg]

Unless some crime was committed in these places, the DAs there have no jurisdiction to prosecute anyone.

Lindell is claiming he has evidence that a cyber attack was used to switch results in five states. Why would that not constitute a crime in those states that could be prosecuted?

[DoodleDawg]

Unless some crime was committed in these places, the DAs there have no jurisdiction to prosecute anyone.

Lindell is claiming he has evidence that a cyber attack was used to switch results in five states. Why would that not constitute a crime in those states that could be prosecuted?

[Dr. Franklin]

So where did the attacks take place? City level? County? State? Anything above the precinct level would have to be aimed at changing the totals. But that still leaves each precinct's count which could be added by hand to compare to the state level?

Stay tuned. The rest of the story is coming out any day now.

Sorry, Mike, but I believe that the cheating was domestic vote fraud in the major cities' counting rooms where ballots without voters were either added to the absentee votes or even the actual in precinct votes. Chasing out the observers during the night and then continuing to count and report is when it likely happened.

And without seeing his evidence, you are 100% certain that that was the ONLY fraud in the election? You don't believe that they cheated EVERY way possible to steal the election? When the cop on the beat is corrupt, why would only one kind of crime be permitted?

[Dr. Franklin]

Lindell is claiming he has evidence that a cyber attack was used to switch results in five states. Why would that not constitute a crime in those states that could be prosecuted?

So you really think that hacking a computer in county A is a crime in county B? Unless the hacker is in county B, that would be a hard sell. How would that work when all of the evidence and witnesses are in county A?

It is wiser to force public opinion to have the state AG prosecute, if that person isn't also compromised.

[DoodleDawg]

So in other words it’s easier to do nothing with this evidence he claims he has?

[Dr. Franklin]

So in other words it’s easier to do nothing with this evidence he claims he has?

Of course, it's always easier to do nothing than do something. When people do something, the critics and trolls come out of the woodwork. In this case, the goal is a civil action, a petition for a writ of quo warranto. That requires a lower standard of proof than a criminal prosecution. Things are in progress, and most of us here are happy about that. The trolls here, however, are not.

[bitt]

P

[Steve Van Doorn]

elections are handled by the legislators. IF there is a proven crime then it’s the courts. They need to have a rock solid CRIMINAL case for a court to take it.

[Bob Ireland]

The proof can be seen in the video of Mike Lindell's Absolute Proof. It is a lengthy - but informative - presentation; the proof of the claim made here is towards the end of the video.

[9YearLurker]

Is this the same proves-nothing, sourced from who knows where, crap that Mary Fanning was pushing in Lindell’s documentary?

There is no question that the election was brazenly stolen, but I don’t trust Fanning to provide other than disinformation that muddies the waters.

[DoodleDawg]

Things are in progress, and most of us here are happy about that.

Ignorance is indeed bliss.

[Dr. Franklin]

Ignorance is indeed bliss.

Which is why new media platforms are being created. Without them, the truth can't get out, and all we get is corporate propaganda.

[Dr. Franklin]

elections are handled by the legislators. IF there is a proven crime then it’s the courts. They need to have a rock solid CRIMINAL case for a court to take it.

If fraud can be proved, it is a civil matter to annul the election certifications through a writ of quo warranto. The standard of proof is less than a criminal case. Judges don't run prosecutions, and without law enforcement and a prosecutor who want to convict the conspirators, no conviction is possible.

[Georgia Girl 2]

“But hey I’m no strategist”

A man needs to know his limitations. 😆

[Georgia Girl 2]

I think you would be correct in your assumption.

If Mike Lindell has this information the military does too. As well as DNI Ratcliffe’s report citing foreign influence.

If the military decides there was foreign interference in our election and/or our current admin is being controlled by a foreign actor it is their duty to step in and as quickly as possible return power to the legitimate civilian government. I fully expect that to happen.

[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "without law enforcement and a prosecutor who want to convict the conspirators, no conviction is possible"

Agreed

[Fury]

...the proof of the claim made here is towards the end of the video...

They are reporting a conclusion. They are not presenting proof

Where are the PCAP files? Raw data files? Log files? Anything?

We expected nothing less when those heehaws refused to release their underlying source code regarding the "hockey stick graph" that was generated, and other source code related to claims made about climate predictions.

When they provide the PCAP files, or other data and log files so their claims can be tested, that will be noteworthy. Until then, it's just 'jackassin.

[Bob Ireland]

*** They are reporting a conclusion. They are not presenting proof
Where are the PCAP files? Raw data files? Log files? Anything?***

To tell the truth I have been so covered up that I have not followed up on that video. Lindell showed all those computer readouts and if I remember correctly said that he was planning to post them. I do not know if he did or not - or whether I remember correctly.

If they are not on his website perhaps you can write him; I think there is a contact link or email.
IR

[remember]

Fury wrote:

They are reporting a conclusion. They are not presenting proof

Where are the PCAP files? Raw data files? Log files? Anything?

Agreed. If I had a dollar for every unsourced claim that I've read on the Internet, I'd be a rich man. I tried to verify some of the numbers that they displayed in the "Scientific Proof" video and was unable to verify any of them. They need to create a website and post the precise sources of all of the data. By precise, I mean actual links to the official sources or precise instructions on how to extract the data from official databases. If the data is valid and they give the precise sources, they might get some serious researchers on their side. Otherwise, those researchers will ignore it, knowing that none of the data can be verified. If they have or do create such a website, please reply with a link to it. Thanks.