This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Posted on 03/24/2021 1:44:38 PM PDT by PROCON
This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
The Ninth Circuit is all the explanation anyone needs.
No surprise here. What would you expect from the 9th Circuit Court?
Of course, I should add that the judges in the majority should be hanged.
Oh the 9th circus. In the past I would have said overturned in 3,...2,... but with the current SCOTUS I ain’t so sure.
I thought Mitch FIXED the 9th circuit, I guess NOT!!
Will the fearful SCOTUS take this appeal ?
Yeah, Mitch fixed it alright.
Just like he fixed the Supreme Court with the last two “ strict constitutionalists “.
What the left wants, is little by little your 2nd Amendment rights to be taken away til there is NONE left..first the AR-15, then conceal carry, then the handgun, then there wont be anymore guns which is their end game
Shades of Dred Scott.
How do you “open carry a gun?
Hmmm, “to keep and bear arms”
Keep is synonymous with own and posses
Bear is synonymous with carry
So this phrase could be substituted as “...to own and carry arms”
Merriam Webster dictionary literally has a sub section for “bear arms” and the first sub definition is “: to carry or possess arms”
Non so blind as those that refuse to see.
The right to “keep and bear arms” does not cover a right to bear arms?
I am certainly not nearly as well-educated as the esteemed members of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, but what does the word ‘bear’ mean in the phrase ‘keep and bear’ arms?
And wherever did they get the idea that the “...second amendment applies to the “defense of hearth and home”? I thought it was there to prevent tyrannical governments, since the Founders had just lived through such an experience.
But if, as they say, the second amendment does apply to defense of hearth and home, why do citizens of Hawaii and California require their state’s permission to exercise the right?
Anyone know what's up with the NRA? They didn't go "woke" I hope.
Off to the SCOTUS then.
My State’s Article 16 - ‘That the people have the right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the State’.
No mention of home, business or in public. This has meant, for nearly 240 years, exactly what it says.
No group of brain-dead, black-bedecked tyrants are going to change it - we simply will not comply and any equally simple-minded LE bully supporting this will be eternally sorry for doing so.
“The majority further argued that the second amendment applies to the “defense of hearth and home....”
Noticeably absent is the right to protect one’s self in the public square.
What part of “Shall Not Infringe” is being misunderstood?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.