Skip to comments.
Michigan judge rules secretary of state violated election law by unilaterally changing absentee voting rules
Washington Examiner ^
| 03/17/2021
| Andrew Mark Miller
Posted on 03/17/2021 8:41:13 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: SeekAndFind
So she broke a state law as a public employee?
When will she be arrested?
They do it all the time to the little people for far less.
She wants to defend herself? Say she thought it was OK? That’s what the courts are for.
So issue a bench warrant and arrest her.
41
posted on
03/17/2021 10:13:17 AM PDT
by
Regulator
(It's Fraud, Jim)
To: SeekAndFind
“He didn’t win, did he?” - Harry Reid
42
posted on
03/17/2021 10:13:55 AM PDT
by
Organic Panic
(Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes.)
To: RideForever
The remedy is for the electorate to elect moral representatives in their state and national elections that can follow the US Constitution. Thus the two bodies elected directly by We the People is the source of the remedy. Not the courts. Not the Governors or President.
Your argument goes around in a logical circle like a dog chasing its tail. If the executive branch does not run legal elections, and the courts refuse to require that the elections are run legally, then the people cannot elect their representatives. What results is a sham and a fraud. Without the ability to redress of grievances from the executive branch or meaningful remedies from the courts, what is left to restore a republic?
43
posted on
03/17/2021 10:24:57 AM PDT
by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it.")
To: SeekAndFind
The states could have easily chose to negate the results of this tainted election.
None chose to do so.
And it was their exclusive prerogative.
44
posted on
03/17/2021 11:46:27 AM PDT
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Mariner
RE: The states could have easily chose to negate the results of this tainted election.
And who represents the state so that they can negate the results of the tainted election?
I believe it is the legislature. The speaker and the state senate majority leader of their state legislature ought to convene and perform this task ASAP, that is - if they really care about the integrity of their elections.
To: SeekAndFind
” if they really care about the integrity of their elections.”
They don’t.
That is self evident.
Not a single legislature even had a vote on it.
46
posted on
03/17/2021 12:39:33 PM PDT
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: RideForever
-. A court can only determine whether an election was UNLAWFUL for failing to follow the state's election laws. It cannot prescribe a remedy due to the 'plenary powers' state legislatures have with respect to election laws. Right once you cheat to get in power you can stay in because you have all the power to stay in power since only you have anything to say about who won.
47
posted on
03/17/2021 2:39:27 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(The election was stolen and there isn't a dang thang you can do about it. Put on your mask and smile)
To: SeekAndFind
Trump won Michigan and so did John James. Democrats are vermin.
48
posted on
03/17/2021 5:20:24 PM PDT
by
FroggyTheGremlim
(I'll be good, I will, I will!)
To: elpadre
If the judge had balls or ovaries, (as the case may be) they would then declare the election null and void, like dems do, and drop the mike.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson