Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nude ‘Sexual Relationship’ Pix Of Congresswoman Cozy With Female Aide Protected By 1st Amendment: Ex-Rep. Katie Hill Gets Judge’s Bad News
My News LA.com ^ | 3/11/2021 | My News L.A.

Posted on 03/11/2021 12:57:26 PM PST by Mark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Mark; Lazmataz

Paging Laz...We eagerly await your verdict on the bong-smoking lesbians.


21 posted on 03/11/2021 1:31:07 PM PST by FormerFRLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

lolz.


22 posted on 03/11/2021 1:31:15 PM PST by ScubaDiver (Reddit refugee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mark

The person who released the revenge porn may be liable. Not the reporter who just reported the story.


23 posted on 03/11/2021 1:35:45 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
said, "Not the reporter who just reported the story"
Tell that to julian assange
24 posted on 03/11/2021 1:41:02 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

Somebody should photoshop Cuomos head in that bong photo.

LOL


25 posted on 03/11/2021 1:47:43 PM PST by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ScubaDiver
"I’m not sure what Federalist paper details the bong-related issues."

I don't either yet Freud once said, "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar." Bill Clinton demonstrated that sometimes a cigar is not just a cigar. Is there a bong corollary?
The burdens of celebrity are weighty.

26 posted on 03/11/2021 2:18:22 PM PST by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
I remember a vignette from the show "L.A. Law" -- a judge is upbraiding both attorneys, and stated "the practice of law isn't about right and wrong, it's about advocacy". ;^)

27 posted on 03/11/2021 2:50:43 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Once you make yourself a public figure, your “reasonable expectations of privacy” go out the window, Katie.

How far does that go? Certainly, this particular Katie Hill story is newsworthy. But can you think of any instance where a public figure still has privacy protections? Would a public figure have a privacy interest in his tax records and medical records?

28 posted on 03/11/2021 2:56:35 PM PST by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

Sure, there are limits to it, but they have a generally reduced expectation of privacy (so it’s hard for them, for example, to win a suit against papparazzi for “harassment” like you or I could for someone following us with a camera, since celebrities invite that kind of attention by nature of their work), and they also have just about zero expectation of privacy for anything that is “in the public interest”, which is especially relevant for government officials.

“Would a public figure have a privacy interest in his tax records and medical records?”

Records that are confidential by legal mandate are private for everyone, even celebrities (except for the recent Donald Trump Exemption, apparently).


29 posted on 03/11/2021 3:07:17 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


30 posted on 03/11/2021 3:18:36 PM PST by deport ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark

If the foo shitz wear it


31 posted on 03/11/2021 3:45:35 PM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark

it is newsworthy, case dismissed.

sorry katie but the rule is don’t take photos you don’t want published because once you take them you lose control of them.

she is the female version of cuomo, except he’s not gay as far as we know.


32 posted on 03/11/2021 3:58:52 PM PST by KingofZion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerFRLurker; Lazamataz

Laz would hit that like the fist of an angry god.

33 posted on 03/11/2021 4:12:46 PM PST by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

Why are certain areas blacked out? K Hill does not mind healthy exposure.


34 posted on 03/11/2021 4:37:13 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

You’d win money.


35 posted on 03/11/2021 4:49:02 PM PST by Lazamataz (I feel like it is 1937 Germany, and my last name is Feinberg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mark

She was stupid to do this. Being a politician she was doubly stupid. She owns this by her stupidity.


36 posted on 03/11/2021 5:43:50 PM PST by leaning conservative (snow coming, school cancelled, yayyyyyyyyy!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

What the hell is with these broads, born in the 80’s, going over to the other side. Is this faggotry going to effect the birth rate? Sickening to see young women cuddling like they were meant to act that way.
Bring back straight sex.


37 posted on 03/11/2021 7:22:08 PM PST by BatGuano (color me "gone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson