Posted on 01/04/2021 8:09:19 AM PST by Trump20162020
2. After the observers left the ballot counting area, ballots in cases we’re pulled out from under a skirted table (with no footage of them having been placed there).
When you look at the original presentation of the video, you can see on different screens there are actually two black skirted tables end to end, but only one is fully visible in each feed. There are some chairs pushed up to one (look like folding chairs), and what looks like an office chair pushed up to the other. The main link shows some lids with white labels on them on the table while they are packing containers up next to the other adjacent table.
Then the video is fast-forwarded and the stacked containers/’suitcases’ are gone. When the suitcases are pulled out, there are some which it is not clear where they came from, but two of them have the same off-kilter pattern of the white labels as you see before the fast-forward.
That doesn’t explain all of the containers under there, or why they put them under the table after the bulk of people had left (which contradicts part of the explanation from the SoS), or why they didn’t seal them, but it does suggest at least those two are probably the ones getting packed up. On the other hand, there are a host of additional questions they bring up regarding conduct and security in the room.
I have had lengthy arguments with libs who stated that there was no spying on the Trump campaign/admin.
So someone did make that claim, but Pres. Trump never made it in the phone call. Raffensperger is lying. Shocker! Plus Raffensperger has not shown the proof that there were only two people who voted, but he is clearly lying about the call.
Sorry if my post misled. President Trump said this earlier in the conversation:
“The other thing, dead people. So dead people voted, and I think the number is close to 5,000 people. And they went to obituaries. They went to all sorts of methods to come up with an accurate number, and a minimum is close to about 5,000 voters.”
I jumped to the part where the the SoS says it is not so, and the Trump team says it is not confirmable without info that the SoS won’t make available.
That would be a four or even five-neuron question and I can’t even get an answer when I try for two.
Might just as well ask a gila monster to perform a high-jump.
What would I say about my accuser if I were caught red-handed?
Why is it all these TDS clowns just say, “debunked” or “not true” without ANY EVIDENCE?
Dems aren’t used to having to hear facts. It frightens them and they lash out like the cornered ferals they are.
When we hired President Trump, we got a well seasoned, highly skilled CEO. To him, this was the boardroom. His job was to pull no punches and pound out fact after fact after fact directed at the leadership of whichever division or sector is under scrutiny.
It’s no surprise that his memory is so clear down to the minutiae. A good CEO has to know precisely what’s going on everywhere, all the time, *unless*, he has upper management he can trust. Obviously, the President has very little of that. He’s handling this one himself.
Raffie must not be a lawyer.
He confessed to the truthfulness of the allegation that there were dead voters.
Now we’re only arguing over how many.
Yuge blunder.
Forensic audit Dominion then a$$hole!!!! Explain the video of ballots being scanned multiple times you lawless prick!
Read that Pompeo was on the call as well. Is this confirmed?
And why are they trying so hard to hide the ballots so they can’t be inspected?
From Patrick Byrne:
A printing shop in Michigan prints ballots for Delaware County, Pennsylvania and as Lancashire County, Pennsylvania (this is normal). But along with the ballots it prints on contract and delivers to those
counties, it prints some ballots that get diverted to Bethpage, New York.
There, a boiler room of folks fill in “Biden” (often without even voting downballot). The ballots (which are forensically legitimate, given that they come from the same print shop as the good ballots, ) then get trucked into Pennsylvania and mailed. Hundreds of thousands.
We have all of that documented. Texts, statements, affidavits, everything.
We also know that this same ballot printing company (and other firms in the same family) also print for Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Georgia.
Narrative #2: China sent counterfeit ballots to Fulton County, Georgia. During the counting on election night, all but four people were shoved out of the counting operation on the grounds of a dangerous “water main break” (that turned out to be “a toilet overflowed”).
Last Wednesday, December 30, the Georgia Senate Judiciary voted to inspect those Fulton County voting operations. Hours later (as I have previously posted) an Enterprise vans pulled up and got filled up with voting materials.
A shredding company in neighboring Cobb County, Georgia was on December 31 given roughly 3,000 pounds of ballots to shred. Authorities have come into possession of those materials.
A handful of papers stuck to the side of the shredding bin. They include some unshredded ballots (which 2 federally certified forensic examiners have affied do not match the legitimate ballots). ALSO, A SHIPPING RECEIPT FROM THE CHINESE FIRM THAT PRINTED THE BALLOTS! IN CHINESE!
Word is the DOJ and DHS have been told to stand down. That President Trump himself has had to call agents on the ground asking them to continue. If you think they should continue, retweet to let @TheJusticeDept know your feelings.
https://twitter.com/patrickbyrne/status/1346108097690009600?s=21
This is exactly what Lin Wood sued over on 11/13 - the illegal changes to election laws, bypassing GA legislature. That case is docketed at SCOTUS but the other side has until 1/11 to respond 🙄
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-799.html
Raffensperger needs to be the first one hung.. TRAITOR!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.