Posted on 12/21/2020 8:03:54 AM PST by SeekAndFind
There was no “harm” before the election, idiot justice.
I saw the arguments. Hagedorn is flat out wrong about the law.
Oh judge, seems like a quick check would determine if your state had 28,000 indefinitely confined people. If not then you have fraud, no?
Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Brian Hagedorn(R) is saying:
1) I see you brought the victims body: Check
2) I see you also have the gun, a forensically matching bullet that was extracted from the victims body: Check
3) I see you brought affidavits from several first-hand witnesses with video evidence that swear by threat of perjury they in-fact heard a gun-shot and saw the victim fall, and recorded it: Check
4) I see you have all necessary unequivocal proof that indeed someone got shot.
But you have not proven a murder took place...
DENIED!
When someone is convicted of “attempted murder” they don’t just throw it out because the perpetrator “might not have actually killed the guy anyway”. Screw this. Our elections were fraudulent and untrustworthy.
With friends like this...
“Wisconsin Supreme Court Judge Explains His Ruling Against Trump Election Lawsuit”
“Because I got a really big check.”
Because he’s a bought off chicken piece of garbage. There, I saved him having to come up with a fake excuse.
If the situation was reversed and Biden was the plaintiff I wonder how Hagedorn would have voted?
Amen
This judge did not receive cash for his decision. This is slander. Please have more respect. However, you cannot blame him for not wanting those photos of him and that little boy published. Kinky.
1. Don’t believe anything in the New York Times.
2. Don’t believe anyone who calls himself a conservative, and then gives an interview to the New York Times.
He would have thrown out any challenge brought before the election due to “lack of harm”
Of course, it's so obvious:
All of the Courts, judges, and Justices don't care how laughably ridiculous they sound to the American people. Lack of harm, laches, lack of standing, etc. Just like the Democrat Party Cabal doesn't care how laughably ridiculous it sounds to the American people throughout the Democrats' 2020 election-fraud year.
Basically, the Democrat Party Cabal (which includes the entire legal system) is saying: "Look, here's the deal. The fact of the matter is, We stole the election. For real. No joke. We have put together ... the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics. Are you taking cocaine? Are you a junkie? C'mon, man!"
That’s how it works.
Translation: you can forget about the courts providing any redress. They’re part of the vote fraud system as well.
LOL. He got caught making decisions with his mini-head.
yeah
he is a severe disappointment
the ruling is gross iniquity
basically it’s, if you think there was going to ve cheating, you file against all the folks you think are cheating before the election occurs
only problem
you can’t lawfully file such claims until after the election
so his idiotic reasoning creates a catch-22 where you can never file election fraud claims at all
and, further
if you followed his moronic advice, filing election fraud charges before the election,
no court will take it
because you have no evidence, yet, as the alleged fraud hasn’t occurred yet because the election hasn’t occurred yet
total moron and deliberate deceiver
I’m a conservative in Wisconsin and it disappoints me when a candidate who claimed to be conservative, one who I donated to and helped get out votes for, goes left after getting a ten-year term.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.