Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Bill Text: TX HB196 | 2021-2022 | 87th Legislature | Introduced
1 posted on 12/08/2020 10:49:29 PM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: yesthatjallen; All
And they walk amongst us....

What's really scary, that this mental retarded *itch got elected by someone's neighbors.

30 posted on 12/09/2020 1:47:35 AM PST by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

I would like to make a friendly amendment, that any home with a state representative can be burglarized by an armed assailant and carry no criminal charge or jail time.


32 posted on 12/09/2020 3:37:59 AM PST by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

“Meza was quick to reassure that her bill “would not totally prevent homeowners from defending themselves. Under the new law the homeowner’s obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner’s responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner.” “

This is STRAIGHT OUT OF EUROPE, where women are making all of the laws now.


33 posted on 12/09/2020 3:50:55 AM PST by BobL (I'm Boycotting the Georgia Elections to 'Teach the GOP a Lesson' (by destroying the country))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

The doctrine “allows”,,,

No, current law makes it illegal for the government to prosecute the homeowner. There is nothing to prevent a homeowner from defending his castle law or no law.

After defending his castle the gov may prosecute, should the law be changed, but the law can do nothing to stop the homeowner.

Only prior physical restraint could prevent the homeowner from defending his castle so he choose to do so.


35 posted on 12/09/2020 4:21:11 AM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

This has about as much of a chance as a state Income Tax. Blood would be shed.


36 posted on 12/09/2020 4:37:36 AM PST by Feckless (The US Gubbmint / This Tagline CENSORED by FR \ IrOnic, ain't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

**Under the new law the homeowner’s obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion.***

A return to the Black Codes which forbade a black man from protecting his family from the KKK!

Now they are trying to make it for all people.


39 posted on 12/09/2020 7:04:07 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

So everything she owns is fair game?


40 posted on 12/09/2020 1:13:18 PM PST by CONSERVE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson