Posted on 11/28/2020 5:37:34 AM PST by Enlightened1
Yep. There is no bottom for the left. Never forget two of their mantras...
1. The end justifies the means
2. By any means necisarry.
Anyone who lives by those beliefs would not hesitate to do anything.
Unless there is a clear line connecting biden with joe blow with factual ballot harvesting, it is all payment for delivering pizza
How so? The Epstein jet story has been completely debunked.........
This is just plain stupid. First of all, I thought ballot harvesting was legal. And second, what does it say on the stubbs? “Paid to so and so for ballot harvesting?”
I’ve dealt with the corrupt media they make up their own rules as they go along.
Remember how evil it was for Linda Tripp to (legally) tape Monica Lewinsky? And then they joyfully play DJT’s own lawyer’s illegal tapes.
I had an incident where I met in a group with a Democrat mayor, and he (of course) lied and took the opposite position at the next town council meeting.
When I spoke to a reporter after that, he said “well you know I can’t print that it’s hearsay!”
I didn’t even bother to tell him that his newspaper is full of nothing but hearsay, that’s practically the definition of a newspaper. But he knew that, they are frauds.
There was an article last night that said that the watermark on 1000 late ballots was wrong. It was gray instead of clear and that the ballots were 100% Biden. .
I don’t think that he needed to be blackmailed. I think that this is who Roberts really is, another Harvard Red, and Indont mean Republican.
If the watermark looked like that on those ballots, they must be photocopies rather than real.
Everyone who wrote and received one of these checks should be INDICTED FOR FELONIES!!
Wrong! Linda Tripp was charged with illegal wiretaps. Maryland was not a one party notification state.
Liberals have been screwing with military ballots for so long-the logistics and the ease of that activity are practically rote for them. It's the 'Cheating 101' every liberal at every level of UA politics learns at mother's knee.
OOOps ...it’s in the wrong thread
the MSM will simply say “those people were paid to LIE saying they voted for Trump.”
Americans have got to stop caring what the MSM says, does or thinks. MSM has gotten the impression that we seek their approval, when in reality they’re so full of crap that they could be a cow pasture. LOL
Of course people’s minds won’t be changed in an instant, or a week, or a year. And it will often look as if no progress at all has been made. But continuing to chip away, a little at a time, will eventually be successful.
If it weren’t for the booze and drugs some judges would never get any sleep.
They are grateful the kickbacks of set the cost of them.
Just a shot in the dark ... James O'Keefe has video evidence. If they can connect the people in the video to the money then they have the purpose. Like I said, a shot in the dark. But, if I were investigating this and I saw the Project Veritas recordings, I would start looking into the people in the recordings. No one in the media did. Law enforcement didn't. The DOJ didn't. The FBI didn't. Let me shorten that. No one in the deep state investigated. It is a possibility that Sidney's team did investigate. It is also possible that this investigation did not begin on Nov 4, but earlier.
Gone are the days when Perry Mason could with a merely well-placed question bring out a surprise confession from a witness no one in the audience suspected and justice was relished.
Bulldog defense attorneys are everywhere as are their counterparts in the media and political realms. We need to use better argumentation and discernment than what academia presently teaches--or better said, avoids teaching.
Socialism could not have gained the firm grasp it has in our university system where better skills of debate are taught and valued.
RE: ust a shot in the dark ... James O’Keefe has video evidence. If they can connect the people in the video to the money then they have the purpose. Like I said, a shot in the dark
_______________________________________
Post #11 above says:
Because it says ‘Ballot Harvesting’ in the memo line.
[Don’t know if the poster was saying it tongue in cheek because if true, I can’t believe anyone would be that stupid]
But if as you say, it’s a shot in the dark, then by definition, it is an attempt to guess something when you have no information or knowledge about the subject and therefore cannot possibly know what the answer is.
Interesting, but I don’t know how it will stand up in court.
Correct. I looked it up. It's part of the 28th Amendment. https://www.ObamaConstitution.com/
I believe that was said tongue in cheek, at least that’s the way I took it. But you never know how stupid these people are on the ground doing this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.