Elections Security Expert Finds Michigan Results a COMPLETE FRAUD — Current Machines Do Not Have Capability to Count the Mass Dumps for Biden in Reported Time Period

Voting Fraud helps Democrats, the dead don’t care about America. Neither do ILLEGALS and other non-citizens (who can vote online or by mail).

Vote Reform Now...

—
Nor do the Ghost (people living at your address you have never met and some of whom reside overseas) and Phantom (your vote registered to some one else) voters. Then there are all the Switch Voters (voters that change their vote en mass after casting it).

Any election reform must include Federal Security standards (there are none currently) - but that would mean DJT wins the election, else the current system will not only remain in place, but grow until every precinct is Dominion or the like and the USA becomes Venezuela on steroids, under President Harris and managed by the CCP, down to the personal level via your mandatory smart phone.

Russ warned of this outcome for years but no one listened saying, “We’ve got this. Don’t worry.”

Despite the more than obvious evidence, a number of people on FR still are skeptical, still believe that the next election will fix the problems - I just do not understand how so many people can be so naive.

If DJT does not succeed for whatever reason, there will never again be an election that is free and fair, but then that will be the least of our worries ...

IF your time of 69 seconds per voter is applied to the 20,000 vote jump for Biden:

That would take 383 hours, 20 minutes to cast 20,000 votes.

IF 16 machines are being used for those votes, it still takes a whole 24 hours.....

ON these kinds of calculations, the fraud just MUST be exposed.

“Ask yourself how American Idol TV show counts millions of votes in just minutes........”

American Idol doesn’t need to count anything - they already know who is going to “win” ahead of time - just like professional “wrestling“.

Also, there is no Easter Bunny.

And Lee Harvey Oswald was almost certainly not a good enough marksman to fire three shots within six seconds at a moving target

He was a marine corps marksman and capable. The range was less than 70 yards at essentially a stationary target (it was moving away not laterally).

Howard Donahue investigated the shooting for Argossy mag back in the 60s with the intent of disproving the Warren Commission Report. As a skilled shooting investigator he made some intriguing discoveries which he documented in the book "Fatal Error" (with Bonar Menninger). He was convinced that Oswald was indeed the assassin.

Donahue was a skilled rifleman. He also participated in a late 60s CBS reenactment of the so_called impossible shooting feat. He and another participant bettered Oswald's time.

Donahue's unique theory is that there were two shooters. One intensional, one negligent. He spends a good deal of the text identifying the diameter of the projectile of the third shot based on terminal ballistics and the likely shooter based on photographic evidence. As an aspiring long range precision shooter at the time (early 90s) I found his explanations reasonable. I probably couldn't throw the bolt twice on the M_C to duplicate Oswald's supposed feat. I wouldn't have to __ he only fired two shots not three. The origin of the 3rd shot is detailed in the book. I still think it is available on Amazon.

Of course this has nothing to do with the steal. One should choose his analogies carefully.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.