Posted on 11/07/2020 8:56:41 AM PST by farming pharmer
I understand you're upset but making statements like the above make you look a bit hysterical.
The hell you talking about? You too stupid to understand context? No one is saying all 75 million votes were made up. But plenty were.
Take your low IQ insults elsewhere dude
"Everyone needs to understand they conjured up 75 million votes for Biden."
Conjure up-"To evoke or imagine"
"No one is saying all 75 million votes were made up."
Nobody except you that is.
Who's stupid now?
Geez man you’re dense. You lack any concept of context. You’re just being an idiot.
The point was the total of 75 million is absurd. Instead of thinking of that obvious context you decided to sit on your unearned moral and intellectual high horse and just look like an ass now.
Now get the hell out of my posts you jumped in like a jackass to begin with
LOL, people who react hysterically as you have are so very obvious in their insecurity.
It is not my problem you lack sufficient knowledge of the language to be able to correctly choose the proper word to express your thoughts and make your point.
Your continuing baseless attack on me simply proves you are unable to deal with criticism.
Perhaps some help is in order?
You’re a child.
A liberal friend assured me that EVEN FOXNews had called the race for Biden... I was speechless...
Cable networks and pollsters don’t certify elections. You probably tried to explain this to them. Or you could just speak a language that they understand. Say that it was a Russian conspiracy and KGB agents And Putin Stole the mail in ballots by the thousands. Even though it was Democratic operatives and volunteers.
LOL All of this would be 'kinda' funny if it weren't so serious... (well, it's still funny in a creepy sort of way...)
These are a few votes now but before the 4AM ballot dumps of who knows what kind of ballots POTUS was hundreds of thousand up even with the inital batch of mail in ballots. Counting stopped then three or four hours later here they come.
WHO CARES GTFO AND OFF OF HERE WITH YOUR PICKING AT SOMEONE OVER STUPID SHIT.
FOCUS ON THE FRAUD OR LEAVE THIS THREAD.
I hope you will take advantage of the free and sincere advice I gave you so you can help yourself.
“Landslide” criticism is not stupid.its a difference between razor-thin support and overwhelming support ala Reagan. Facing the truth rather than wishful thinking. Realizing we’re absolutely surrounded by commies.
God forbid someone look the slightest like he doesn’t all-hail to Trump.
Recap of their strategy
Overall goal is power over the federal gov’t. Appointments have taken over the administrative arms. Elections are more difficult because they are determined by vote and law.
To control the elections, the strategy has been to reduce security and change laws to favor party-controlled districts. Traditionally this was through gerrymandering but recently it has been done through a combination of changing election rules at the state level and removing decisions from the legal officials (e.g., legislatures per the Fed Constitution) and placing them in the hands of the party in courts (judges) and other state positions.
This year, 2020, the strategy was to go for the top of the ticket. That was considered the key win to implement later phases in strategy. A final taking beginning at the top. It is more expensive and difficult to do this bottom-up so taking the top is cheaper and faster.
Important elements of this strategy were:
(1) control of parts of state gov’ts, e.g,. judges and state officials, who could affect actions, legal or not. Also key is and has been…
(2) control of information (propaganda agencies and social media tech).
The role of the candidates was reduced to lower level of importance. It is nice to have attractive candidates but it isn’t necessary to the strategy and that should be obvious. They candidates only needed to be flexible with the strategy. Some candidates are too independent and forceful to cooperate with the party’s strategy on all counts, therefore, the chosen candidates were adequate candidates for this strategy, not for popular appeal but for flexibility and compliance with the party strategy. One candidate is deep into the party and has a long history of .... The other candidate fits, too. Hide or obscure them for much of the campaign season while the voting plans are implemented.
Extend pre-and post-election voting and vote counting. The more time, the more opportunities to change rules, make vote adjustments, and especially propagandize. The more time to propagandize the citizens and international officials and populations, the better. Years of this have wearied many people.
Stop counting on election day when the vote is at a point where the number of votes needed to “win” is determined. This turned out to be between midnight and 6am the day after the election, of course, because that is about when the counts become clear. Stop counting occurs in areas that are totally in party control and where the vote totals or electoral votes were big enough to manipulate with the least effort. These areas also are areas where the party machine has decades of established vote control.
Announce you are winning. Then, announce you have won on Saturday when there is little attention and people are still anxious about the result. Repeat this announcement endlessly over the weekend when there is less scrutiny. This is not true, of course, as the vote is not completed and the electoral college has not acted. The actual election is indeterminate until court cases are resolved and the vote cleaned up.
Hide the counting so there is ambiguity. Hide everything—make it extremely difficult to get any information or find evidence. Make the effort untraceable and engage in tactics that cannot be caught after the fact such as votes (mail in) that don’t require matching signatures. This follows months, right up to election day, of lawsuits (300 or more) and state-level actions to reduce vote integrity and security.
Intimidate officials in courts and in the general population with threats related to employment and public outing if they disagree. Meanwhile, propagandize endlessly that the vote was clean and is clear. When the court cases require decisions, the judges and the public will be afraid to decide contrary to party wishes. This gets worse by the hour.
Once ended, the system is changed. You have one party with outsized influence and essentially one-party rule at the national level. The next election will grip the states at their level. The legitimacy of the elected officials and the govt will be erased but people will support it regardless. Once you have them in your grip, they will change their minds to agree and comply. This is well-established science.
Keep in mind that the individuals and teams involved in this do not think like you. They don’t follow laws or rules. They are working to win, regardless. Don’t be distracted into thinking if you expose them or their rule-breaking they will withdraw. They don’t care. They want submission. That will be their primary goal going forward.
What can you do? Don’t respond to those who threaten or have power to hurt you or your job. Respond to others with indirect questions. Put the ball in their court by asking questions. This would take a long discussion, but you get the idea.
Your ancestors and this nation’s defenders delivered to you the right to vote, to honest and fair elections, and to hold your views. Never forget that.
Good post.
The subhumans that subscribe to this line of thought should be put to the rope in the British fashion for pirates: let them hang out dry for a few months as an example.
Outstanding. Hopefully this helps encourage the many conservative defeatists.
Really? Then explain why the Democrats refused to accept the results for four frickin’ years. Those same progressive idiots are whining now about “peaceful transition.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.