George Soros's Plan B If Biden Loses

townhall.com ^ | 11/1/2020 | Frank Wright

[zaxtres]

Trump can have a solid election and the insurrectionists will still gain traction. Why? Because the person in office has an R behind his name.

I have contended over and over again, this is not about Trump but the demoncraps lack of the office, thus power. Anyone with an R behind their name would be subject to this same abuse by the left. The fact that Trump is fighting back makes the left even madder and steaming at the ears. The person is just the rally point du jour for the left. If we look back since, at least the 70’s, we see a ramping up of rhetoric and aggression from the left. What has exacerbated this?

Sadly, it is the internet that has allowed this gain ground faster than without. As the internet has grown, so too has the left’s rhetoric, anger and aggression. The reason for this is that the LSM has lost control of the narrative. The LSM still tries to control the narrative and sometimes they do but a good percentage of non-narrative gets through. For example the Hunter Biden Story recently. Had there been no internet, this story would not have seen the light of day.

In the beginning of the internet, the internet was summarily controlled by AOL who claimed direct access to the world wide web now called the internet. However, after their pay by the hour model was transformed into an unlimited model, they were caught as being the middle man between the consumer and the world wide web. The reason they were caught? The advent of internet providers with no “proxy wall” such as what AOL was.

Quickly after this that the world of bloggers started taking the stage on the world wide web. At first these bloggers were touted as conspiracy nuts by those who the world thought were more credible at the time. And there is some credence to this as it was conspiracy nuts and stuff like parascope website that were early hits. Then discussion boards started spreading websites by word of mouth. This is now called “organic advertising” but in the end it was word of mouth advertising.

Even still people viewed the ionternet as a fantasy land but the seriousness of the internet started to become seeded and grow. Even when FreeRepublic was established in 1999, the internet was still being dismissed as a playground for conspiracist nuts and those people who could be anything they wanted. If a person wanted to follow the psychology on the internet and its evolution, all one would have to do is follow how dating that originated first on the internet and taken to off the internet has evolved over time.

The internet has always one been a microcosm of real life. A microcosm which included five to ten or even more times the intensity in emotions as real life. If someone was vulnerable in real life they were even more vulnerable on the internet. If one’s personality at a bar was subtle and shy, one could let their darker side come alive and become more assertive and aggressive on the internet. This actually gave rise to the “trolls” then later “cyberbullying” as a real issue but if one were to look off the internet, examples of this lie all around us . Maybe not as pronounced but they are there.

Another reason why the internet is more intense is because the interactions take place in our minds, even when watching video. Most of the time, not always, computer interactions are done one-on-one or one-to-many. THis interaction is the reason that gave rise to the fact that people would say this interaction was “not real” in the beginning.

It is true that many took this to heart and plumbers became pilots and lawyers became whatever they wanted. However, how many times have people done this in a bar? How many times has someone lied about their occupation at an in-person bar? Many times over. The difference is that in a bar we can see a person’s body language and on the internet we are void of body language. Meaning we cannot see whether a person is smiling or how they are standing or sitting. Are they leaning in towards us when they are speaking to us? Do they touch us when they say certain words etc.

All of this has meaning whether we notice this subconsciously or not. What makes the interaction so much deeper and intense is that it occurs in our minds. It is the emotion of our minds at the time we read the text that determines the outcome of the conversation. While this can change on how the text is written and our education on how it is interpreted.

This grammatical and syntactical interpretation is but a mere fraction of how our mind reacts to those words on a screen. It is our own emotions that determines what we read is anger, sadness or glee. If we feel glee we read gleefully. Meaning that most of what we read will be in the positive light. However, if something is read with anxiousness it can turn out in anger or sadness or it could turn out gushing with delight or just happy. This interaction and its emotional value is exponentially increased based off of what we are feeling at the time we read the text. This is why people are compelled towards suicide after a session on the computer.

I will give an example of everything I have talked about. I have been on the internet when people started hosting what are called Bulletin Board Services in their own homes. These were ANSI DOS based systems that were connected at first with a 14.6 baud modem via a telephone line. My AOL bills were consistently averaging around 800 dollars to 1,000 a month. I have been on chat programs such as AOL, Yahoo, PalTalk and others that I have long ago forgotten about. I have played in MMORPGs in guilds and clans and have run guilds and clans. I was with NWN and Vanilla WoW. SO my people experience on the internet is vast. I have spoken with people all over the world in almost every language known to man. I have heard things that would make nuns fall down and lay prostrate for days in fron t of an altar begging their Lord and God for forgiveness. And I have spoken and heard a lot of stuff that would make even a SEAL Team 6 Member cringe, And I am not the only one that has. Let us suffice it to say, I have extensive history on the world wide web as a user of it.

In one particular chatroom, a group of us would gather. At the time only one person, usually me, would speak and moderate the room. In this chatroom there was one female whose age at the time was around 26. Many guys tried to get know her and all of them failed. Other people formed couples and people came and went. However, when asked this woman would always say she did not believe in love over the internet because the internet was not real. She took this stance for years at the chagrin to many a suitor that came through the room. She had moved from NY to FL at one point.

I eventually left that chat group and revisited it several years later. When I came back she was clearly involved in a relationship that was formed first online and then taken off line. When I asked her about it she said that the relationship was more intense online than it was off line.

She like so many others had succumbed to the intensity of emotions in their head when the read the words off the screen. Another example is when I tested on this theory blindly. A guy who pretended to be a female began flirting with me. (A common refrain I hold is that treat all people on the internet as a male unless they can prove they are female in person. This has become harder today than before.)

When they finished testing me on this theory, they divulged it was a male who spoke to me but they confirmed that in pretending that the guy was a female and acting like a female he tried to take on the persona of a female. It was then that several things were verified that his mindset began to take a major role in his responses. Even when people think the internet is nothing but fantasy, their minds and emotions are intensified in their reactions, more so than if the interaction were to occur at a coffee shop or bar.

So in the end, the insurrectionists will always have traction because people are people and their emotions are intensified over the internet. Most of all it will hit text messaging. When Trump wins, this will hit the Social Media and it will hit groups like FR. The emotions will be intensified and there will be some recruitment done. It will be through all of this interaction that will move some people to action, they are not already. It won’t matter if the election is solid or not. It does not matter whether the next President is Trump or some other Republican, the snowflakes will be triggered by their candidate not winning. As well as the fact it is a person with an R behind their name. Your opponent on the political left knows this. And they use everything I have mentioned above against the people to control the people. It is why we have riots now instead of protests. Learn this. Know this. Find out why this happens and you know your opponent.

[PIF]

Soros is very boastful, but in the end he works for the CCP.