Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No, Other Policies Don’t Morally Outweigh The Democrat Party’s Support For Murder
The Federalist ^ | September 15, 2020 | Daniel Maria Klimek

Posted on 09/15/2020 8:27:25 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: semimojo

I don’t think “failure to demand legislation” is an accurate description of what’s said to be soul threatening.


21 posted on 09/15/2020 4:49:23 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
I don’t think “failure to demand legislation” is an accurate description of what’s said to be soul threatening.

My original question was

"What about someone who opposes abortion and works to minimize its frequency yet thinks the state should stay out of it?

Is not wanting the government to control these decisions really a mortal sin?"

I was told:

"If you believe that the core functions of government are to protect life, liberty, and property, then no, government can’t stay out of it."

And promoting a system that removes government’s protection of life so that others may murder innocents for convenience, is a mortal sin."

If it's a mortal sin to "stay out of it" I assume that means I need to advocate for state regulation.

22 posted on 09/15/2020 4:58:31 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson