Posted on 08/09/2020 9:34:44 AM PDT by janetjanet998
Halper's background is CIA. He would have been apprised that Carter Page had received both FBI and CIA assignments and was the perfect patsy for his self-aggrandizing plot-in-development, first to get Flynn, then The Donald, "six ways from Sunday."
In the recording, the interplay between Halper and Schrage probably fostered Halper's confidence that he could trust that (seemingly) fawning "yes man."
Maybe he really does ‘have a lock on the truth’
If so, maybe he really should prepare himself to die nasty!
Why hasn’t Halper been investigated or put under oath? This all points to Clinton and Obama and a plan to get Flyn from the very start. The FBI was just following Obamas orders and all of it was illegal and everyone is dirty and nobody wants to come clean. God will make all things known eventually.
When a sage old '98er weighs in on a topic, the rest of us may as well stand back and shut up.
lol
Durham doesn’t need to go public he NEEDS to start indictments!!!
Not to make any excuses for the Durham investigation but, as I understand it, investigations start at the bottom and work their way up the chain. They may be gathering the evidence while letting these guys run their mouths in public before dragging them in for questioning. Or, Durham may be deliberately slow-walking the investigation hoping that the administration changes hands and he can bury it. Hard to tell at this point.
Maria has one of the most enlightening shows on any Sunday morning. JMHO.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
you’re right
just started watching recording of maria’s show now.
bbb
read later
Expose theDetective#StruggleSession
@irootsorg
·
8m
Flashback #StevenSchrage Q: DID YOU FAIL TO INTERVIEW SCHRAGE?
MUELLER: OKAY, ER..THOSE ARE [UNINTELLIGIBLE] I AM GOING TO STAY AWAY FROM..
https://twitter.com/DocRock1007/status/1154130471846121472
This is the initiating fuse of the bombshell. Out in public before the JOKE that is the en banc DC circuit judges “hearing” about the DOJ dismissed case that Judge Sullivan was ordered to dismiss by a 3 judge panel of that same DC Circuit.
How is it that Halper A.) Got office of Net Assessments payments in those amounts?— Was Net Assessments “laundering” this for the three letter “AGENCY” and Brennan? Answer— YES>
ANSWER Brennan is serious TOAST.
DIA vs. See eye ehhhhhh dogs.
Sullivan should dismiss the case, before he loses his judgeship.
Perhaps... is he Mormon this Schrage? Because “going public” in this way is the END of any starting career (even at State). But it is a GOOD thing for Gen. Flynn.
How do you know this is a Romney op? Is it through Rubio in his new “role”.
Because it would have to go through ODNI and DNI Ratcliffe, you know— if it was not a completely independent decision on the part of Schrage himself.
Halper should be indicted. DEFENSE Dept Office of Assessments.... AUDITED (just as Flynn wanted— to expose the piggy bank for the seeing eye dog “agency”).
And how would this “walk in” know who has been subpoenaed by Durham.... again another leak. Not bloody likely.
Who does Schrage now work for, and on whose DIME? There’s a question.
If it is Ratcliffe aiding Barr-— oh yeah.
Absolutely right... John McCain was instrumental in all the treachery from the beginning.
Absolutely right... John McCain was instrumental in all the treachery from the beginning.
I have no idea, except to say that is what he said, which is surprising by not unexpected...
Welcome back.
Now this Breaking News exclusive:
It was the spark that ignited one of the worst abuses of power in our country's history. In July of 2016 Carter Page attended an overseas conference in Cambridge where he first met informant Stefan Halper.
Three months later, the FBI secured the first of four FISA warrants to unlawfully spy on Carter Page.
My next guest is the man who first introduced Page to Halper while he was working as a PhD candidate at Cambridge.
Steven Schrage is with us. He is joining me for the first ever television interview for him, and good morning, Steven. Thank you so much for being here.
Good morning, glad to be here. You worked for Stefan Halper, and we want to ask you really the background of 2016.
So let's start there.
What is your background in terms of working with Stefan Halper and why did you invite Carter Page to a conference that you were planning?
Right. I had had a long background working on crime and terrorism at the White House and in Congress, and went to Cambridge to finish a PhD I had started years earlier at Harvard and my intent was always to have a conference that looked at presidential campaigns and national security risk.
I had no idea that it would blow up into this. Halper was not that engaged, up until the point where he crossed paths with Page and Christopher Steele's former MI6 boss Richard - Sir Richard Dearlove.
At that point he seemed to really focus on Page and really try to isolate him and kind of ingratiate himself with the Trump campaign in ways that seemed like a real turning point.
But how Page wound up there with Halper was really a comedy of errors, and it was something where we were looking for someone from the Trump campaign to make sure the Trump campaign was represented, and it just kind of happened to fall on his lap that Page landed there.
Well, why did you want someone from the Trump campaign?
I mean here you have - you wrote about these guys, and you call them the Cambridge Four - that they're washed up spies.
Why are washed up spies wanting to get in with the Trump campaign?
Well, for the conference they were not involved in that decision at all. The conference was because I came from a Republican background, and I wanted an unbiased conference. I wanted to make sure if we had Madeleine Albright on one side, we had a Trump representative on the other side.
I don't believe Stephan Halper even knew Carter Page was going to be at the conference until I emailed him - you know - we had talked about people - but what happened was before the conference.
If you look at it a few weeks ago Christopher Steele had been hired by a Clinton campaign contractor and then the spark that I think really set this off was when Stefan Halper Christopher Steele's old boss Richard Dearlove and Page were all together and Trump was portrayed - to my surprise - as this national security threat, and that's when the interest really started to bubble in terms of where this took off.
So let me go back to Stefan Halper for a minute.
This is your PhD supervisor - the Office of Threat Assessments awarded him four contracts between May of 2012 and September of 2016.
In September of 2015 he was awarded a contract valued at 245,000 dollars to study Russia and China characterize that do do are these the kind of money these the kind of paychecks you get for doing a report on on China and Russia and isn't it interesting that just months later after he was awarded another contract of 411,000 dollars, then the wiretapping of Carter Page started.
Yes, I have never heard of that in an academic setting. You know - providing that much compensation for these types of reports.
One thing I will say that was quite unusual - was even after Carter Page had been kind of smeared improperly as a quote-unquote Russian Spy - Stefan Halper would profusely thank me for introducing him to Page.
And I never really understood that - but once I saw these massive payments kind of corresponding to when he was surveilling Page and Padopoulos - which I learned about in 2018 - you know there was obviously could be a connection there.
You know there's a theory about how that played out.
The key part, and I think the real smoking gun in all this is: All these tentacles lead back to this small group, including Stefan Halper at the center of Spygate, Christopher Steele at the center of Russiagate, Stephan Halper's FBI handler - none of the Senate has subpoenaed these or called these people to talk in four years.
I think that's the real smoking gun.
How are these people being protected and how are we at a point so close to the election and with Flynn's hearing coming up that no one has called these people and gotten to the bottom of this and you know the information I provide provides a lot of troubling aspects of this.
So let's talk about that because you actually recorded Stefan Halper.
He was aware that you recorded him because you used to do recordings - but this is on January 10, 2017 - two days before there was a leak in the Washington Post - that General Flynn was going to be investigated about the Logan Act and you recorded Stefan Halper talking about Flynn.
Let's roll that recording right now.
Stefan Halper: "If you go to the NSC, you have to consider very carefully uh if you feel it's, it's appropriate for you to work for Flynn or you want to work with. I don't think Flynn's going to be around long yeah I mean that's just my guess but right the way the thing these things work, you inevitably find yourself at odds with someone. Yeah, I mean you always do, yeah. Probably lots of people, right? And when your opponents - so-called enemies - but when people are invited, right, are looking for ways of uh, exerting pressure, they go to people that they know you're at odds with, right? Right, and that's how it feels, and then eventually you get squeezed, yeah, pretty hard. And that that was my kind of lesson - but Flynn's reaction to that is to blow up, get angry, yeah. Yeah, it's really now we're working cuz yeah yeah yeah but that is his reaction. Why - that's why he's so unsuitable."
So what do you think was going on here, Steven? Do you think Halper was working for the FBI or the CIA and getting paid by the Office of Threat Assessment to "dirty up" Flynn and dirty up Trump campaign officials?
How did he [Stephan Halper] know Flynn was about to blow up two days before it was in the Washington Post?
Right - and some of this is things that I believe based on interacting with him for a long time - but there are beliefs.
It was very odd because I had told him extensively that you know Flynn was incredibly close with President Trump.
At the time as it's been reported the FBI was about ready to pull its investigation on January 4th before the Oval Office meeting was met where using the Logan Act on Flynn was discussed so I don't think he had any independent reason to expect that this would happen to Flynn.
He had also bragged to me and talked to others that David Ignatius [my aside - Ignatius is a steaming pile of Washington Post Democrat shiite] was one of his big press media contacts.
So you know - again, it seems something that really needs to be investigated.
One of his students was also working with Ignatius at the Post - Bob - Robert Costa [aside - another steaming pile of Washington Post Democrat shiite], so the fact that this has not been investigated that no one has called them to testify and looked at this I think is is as shocking as what's happened.
Well what about you I mean you you told me you spoke with John Durham somebody else told me that they thought you were disseminating the dossier are you involved in this?
No, I had no idea at all. I mean, this has really up-ended my life. I was actually about to fly out for my wedding when the stories broke that - you know - my PhD supervisor for a long time was this FBI spy known as The Walrus, and since that time I've tried to uncover that I've worked with uh you know investigators to try to do this.
But with this Flynn information I discovered a few weeks ago, and the fact that these investigations have not moved so far, I felt I needed to come forward before the Flynn hearing.
And frankly the fact that some people have been spreading rumors about about other people leaking it - I think there were quite a few Republicans involved in leaking this - that I've found out through these different processes that have not been revealed.
So I think there's a lot of people trying to cover the tracks of what happened to start this thing and I think that's why it's so critical that we get to the bottom of it.
And you did talk to John Durham, correct?
This shouldn't be political - about Democrats and Republicans - this is about officials undermining our democracy and it needs to be known long before the election.
Steven Schrage - we want you to come back, hopefully you'll come back next week or the next couple of weeks to continue drilling down on this very important story.
Thank you, sir - very much.
Steven Schrage joining us - we'll be right back.
Bttt.
5.56mm
Great catch. So, instead of the poster on this thread calling Schrage a Romney stooge— he could very well be, on his own, encouraged by Nunes.... coming forward.
Not a stooge. A former undersecty of State for.... what?
With Flimsey Grahamnesty by his side.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.