Retired judge calls effort to drop case against ex-Trump adviser 'gross abuse' of power

Reuters ^ | June 10, 2020 | Sarah N. Lynch and Jan Wolfe

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

I hope Roberts doesn’t throw another t**d into the punch bowl.

[cranked]

Ummmmmmm, given to a very very recent Supreme Court case, the “gross abuse of power” is that exhibited by the idiot judge Sullivan......................................

[Oystir]

I listened to the hearing. And while we can never tell from listening to questions from Judges what they will eventually decide, it seems quite likely that the briefs you quote aren’t where we are headed. It looks like it is procedural, as I stated, and going back to Sully where more procedural stuff will happen like entertaining the motion to revoke the plea, and if revoked move towards trial, the gov action to seek a dismissal or a possible sentencing. There could even be more motions for Mandamus. I continue to hope I am wrong...

[Gay State Conservative]

Why are we publishing anything from Reuters? They’re just as rabidly anti Trump as MSLSD.

[olezip]

A retired judge on Wednesday urged a federal court not to allow the Justice Department to dismiss its criminal case against President Donald Trump's former adviser Michael Flynn, citing evidence of a "gross abuse of prosecutorial power."

Is this retired judge focusing on a questionable and trivial matter of a highly dubious claim that General Flynn lied? He is trying to make a mountain out of a molehill. He should stay retired or be impached along with Sullivan.

Lawyer activists in black robes should all be removed from office. Terrible insult to the Justice Department, terrible ignorance of the mountains of evidence in this case.

Why are these judges so desperate to prolong this matter and interfere with the Executive branch of our government? Methinks he protests too much!