Posted on 04/26/2020 2:41:30 PM PDT by rktman
This is another strike against his run. It will lose him voters like me who liked him in the beginning of his run. There are so many normal law abiding citizens in this country who own guns and will consider this a try at little more erosion of our right to own a firearm for fun or sport. He is making all the wrong moves to catch the swing voter.
First Joe has to sniff out the perfect VP
Gotta be sniff-dilly-icious.
“The Hill reported that former Democrat gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams and former Democrat presidential hopefuls Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar, and Kamala Harris will all take part in the series, albeit on different days.”
Gee, I see that Herr Whitmer is missing from the lineup.
Must be Slo-Joe knows a Jackbooted, Bushel Breasted, Stormtrooping, Nazi was going to be a tough sell in Nov.
My guess is all them smell like burning a sack of pampers in the burning barrel.
Your neighbors won’t come over to see what is on the BBQ.
Three Nationality Harris is not a natural born citizen.
Natural born citizens are naturally citizens because they can’t be anything else, they were born here of citizen parents.
Indian/Jamaican born here is THREE nationalities.
The defining characteristic of natural born citizen is sole loyalty, allegiance and citizenship.
That is why the founders changed from Hamilton’s suggested “born a citizen”.
No doubt this “forum” will finally devolve to advocacy of forced confiscation of all firearms.
Hell, they may all eventually agree after the first crosses over lol
It cannot end otherwise. It’s axiomatic.
“Not to quibble, but the Constitution grants no rights.”
Skip to the point, so are you saying that the people who do not believe in your god have no rights?
I do not agree with that at all.
If you have to resort to “so, are you saying”, you’ve already conceded that you cannot support your position, but can only attack what you pretend is mine.
If you attribute our rights to your god, one I do not believe in, I’m native and shaman, then by logical conclusion all of those who do not believe your “minority” world belief have no rights.
The provable fact is that far more people on this earth do not believe in your god than do believe in your god.
I do not concede anything. I will flatly state that your thinking is in the “minority” of world wide or multi cultural perspective.
So now that you have danced around the questions.
The direct questions are.
If you attribute our rights to your god does that guarantee these same rights to all others even if we are situated in a location where those who recognize your god are absent?
Or do we recognize that there is some other granting authority that we must adhere to?
I don’t owe you anything.
Sorry you can’t answer the questions. You never can.
I simply have no interest in responding to crap you just made up.
If you want to discuss what I actually said, I’d welcome the discourse.
If you’re so narrow of scope that you cannot see anything but your own warped prejudices; as you say, i will pass.
And if you base every answer on a factious god most of the world does not believe in then you have no answer to factual conversation.
And if a frog had a pocket, he could pack a pistol, and wouldn’t have to be afraid of snakes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.