Posted on 04/12/2020 1:20:02 PM PDT by a little elbow grease
Thanks for clarifying. I suppose you accept Fauci.
> Why do people keep relying on this guy. He is a publicity whore drama queen. <
Bingo. I’ve read about him. He might have a PhD or three. But he’s still a nut (to put it kindly).
I think he’s running again this year.
When I see Fauci, I think of Sessions. Deep, Deep, Deep State dwellers.
The goal of better decision making is behind the current hype surrounding big data, the emergence of “evidence-based” everything—policy,—medicine,—practice,—management, and issues such as climate change, fiscal predictions, health assessment, even what information you are exposed to online. The field of statistics has been addressing the reliability of results derived from data for a long time, with many very successful contributions (for example, confidence intervals, quantifying the distribution of model errors, and the concept of robustness).
The scientific method suggests skepticism when interpreting conclusions, and a responsibility to communicate scientific findings transparently, so others may evaluate and understand the result. We need to bring these notions into our everyday expectations when presented with new computational results. We should be able to dig in and find out where the statistics came from, how they were computed, and why we should believe them. Those concepts receive almost no consideration when findings are publicly communicated.
I’m not saying we should independently verify every fact that enters our daily life—there just isn’t enough time, even if we wanted to—but the ability should exist where possible, especially for knowledge generated with the help of computers. Even if no one actually tries to follow the chain of reasoning and calculations, more care will be taken when generating the findings when the potential for inspection exists. If only a small number of people look into the reasoning behind results, they might find issues, provide needed context, or be able to confirm their acceptance of the finding as is. In most cases the technology exists to make this possible.
Victoria Stodden
Associate Professor of Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Where Did You Get That Fact?
https://www.edge.org/responses/what-should-we-be-worried-about
bbb
sounds interesting.
try to catch up after supper.
“— according to the DOD documents, the project was plagued by manipulation of data, inapropriate statistical analyses, and falsified data presentation and publication to attempt to get a faulty vaccine approved...”
Fauci has exposed himself as nothing more than a shill for the Bill Gates population reduction, vaccine scam.
If you were a respected doctor of medicine would you align yourself with someone (Bill Gates) who openly advocates the elimination of a significant portion of the human population?
That should tell you all you need to know of the great Dr. Fauci.
But there is more on that SOB:
Previous post:
Re: Dr. Fauci,
I refer you to Dr. Judy Mikovits book “Plague”.
Mikovits, had over 30 years in vaccine and cancer research was fired and then arrested and crucified in the scientific community when she blew the whistle on the blood supply and vaccine retrovirus contamination.
This vaccine contamination is thought to be connected to all sorts of human illness from autism to cancer and chronic fatigue syndrome. Fauci, not only did not come to her defense he threatened her with additional arrest. Fauci had the knowledge, the opportunity and the responsibility to support the profound scientific findings of Dr. Judy Mikovits.
He choose not to do so.
He also has flat out lied during Trump’s briefing’s when he supported the theory that the virus came from the Wuhan Wet Market and he is affiliated with the Grant from NIH that was funding the Corona virus research at UNC Chapel Hill “in collaboration with the Wuhan Lab”.
Like to explain that Dr. Fauci???
And what about this Dr. Fauci?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJb-g8ZB4xo
And this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR8gw6GLwug&list=UUJkOZZrGNEJYDhzVwd24Bfg
Bfl
This guy is half crazy and a self promoter in the extreme. Look at his Wikipedia page first. He claimed that inhaling hot air kills the Corona virus among other things. Just because he is bad mouthing Fauci and Birx doesn’t make him reasonable.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_Ayyadurai
Bookmark
A number of years ago I read an article written by Ayyadurai in which he claimed to have invented email. Okay, fine. Maybe he did. But then I followed the links he provided as evidence.
All the links were to websites he himself owned! Anybody who would do something like that I’d treat with deep suspicion.
It would be as if I had claimed to have invented, say, toothpaste. And then as evidence I cite a paper written by me.
He’s right in this case, but in general it’s impossible to take him seriously as long as he claims to have invented email.
He’s a self-promoting psycho who claims to have invented email.
Hell, I am running for US Senate though I doubt anyone will vote for me, me included.
Ayyadurai’s undergraduate degree from MIT was in electrical engineering and computer science. He completed another master’s degree in mechanical engineering, also from MIT; and in 2007, he obtained a Ph.D. in biological engineering from MIT in systems biology which is the computational and mathematical analysis and modeling of complex biological systems. In other words, he has no idea what his computations will do as he can’t try them and his computer can’t either. Another educated idiot.
rwood
> Hell, I am running for US Senate though I doubt anyone will vote for me, me included. <
Don’t give up so easily. Jump-start your campaign by telling everyone that you invented the iPhone.
Shiva s not a flake - what he says makes perfect sense, and Fauci and Birx are liars.
He is absolutely right about the data being fixed - I’ve been pointing out what’s wrong with it for weeks here on FR - and this guy articulates the problems perfectly.
Fauci and Birx stand there every day defending their failed models, unwilling to concede any lack of certainty - even though they have NO idea what is going to happen. When asked why there are far less deaths than predicted they arrogantly give credit to social distancing, never acknowledging truth about the profound limitations of their ability to predict the future spread and deadliness of a virus.
I can’t listen to theses big Pharma whores anymore - I wish Shiva was on President Trump’s team instead of them.
They can’t say it is because of social distancing BECAUSE six days ago they BOTH stood at that podium and declared that even WITH mitigation the death toll would be 100,000 - 200,000 these two are nothing but two global bureaucrats that are full of BS!!!
He's always shilling for medical quackery in the form of “spices cure your ills!”... And he trots out ‘white guilt’ as a conspiracy to keep the dark man down. So I wouldn't put any bets on his articles especially when he desperately seeks notoriety.
But he invented EMail!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.