Why not?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: Libloather
Maybe it's a way to change people's opinions away from socialism and towards the feeling that they own a piece of these corporations that are being demonized by the MSM.
This would be another way for people to understand how socialism takes away things they own, once they own stock.
-PJ
42 posted on
02/15/2020 3:50:09 PM PST by
Political Junkie Too
(Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
To: Libloather
To the left, “stocks” is code word for rich and the upper 10%.
Expect “Trump only cares about rich people” and other permutations to be repeated ad nauseum.
47 posted on
02/15/2020 4:31:10 PM PST by
SeekAndFind
(look at Michigan, it will)
To: Libloather
A double down on mal-investment. The collapse is going to be spectacular.
To: Libloather
Better to use a small percentage of incoming SS money to buy stocks, which I suspect would take the heat off that account going broke.
It would be interesting to see some stats if the government invested, say 5% or even 1% of SS receipts into the market in the last 10 or 20 years. Pick any number. I’ll warrant SS would have been in a lot better shape by now.
54 posted on
02/15/2020 8:26:59 PM PST by
Oatka
To: Libloather
57 posted on
02/15/2020 11:55:11 PM PST by
BunnySlippers
(I love BULL MARKETS!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson