Judicial Watch Statement on Iowa Secretary of State Misleading about Accuracy of State’s Registration Rolls

Judicial Watch ^ | February 3, 2020 | Tom Fitton

[Svartalfiar]

On this other thread, I ended up looking into the numbers for Dallas County (convo with jjotto, who is apparently from the area).

He says it's a decently Republican county, which makes having such high registration numbers a little odd (this mostly happens in heavy Dem areas). But based on current estimated population, and the registration numbers published by the SoS, they do look to have about a 100+% registration. (~90M people, so about 60M voting age, SoS shows 63M registered JAN2020.)

Granted, it could all be on the up and up, but even close to 100% registration is odd, as the national average is around 70%. So they should have about 48M registered. SoS definitely attacked JW saying their numbers were wrong, but my speed estimate calculation shows maybe not JW's 114%, but definitely in the 100% area. Hopefully they get this figured out before too much blood is shed amongst our side.

[jjotto]

Initial check is that they are lackadaisical about clearing out dead registrations.

Note the actual number of votes cast in these counties. Apart from Scott and Johnson, this ain’t Chicago.

[Svartalfiar]

The Iowa secretary of state’s release of interim voter registration data further confirms our concerns and shows that five of the eight counties we listed are still over 100%.

And this line from JW's statement here seems to confirm what I said - Pate's published pdf numbers seem to back up the JW concerns, not refute them. He may want to do a bit more digging into his counties and see what's up. Maybe a bunch of the inactive rolls are double-counting other active ones or something similar?

[liberalh8ter]

Sure looks like her and like a SS guy behind her. What’s the backstory on the picture?