Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/05/2019 7:19:50 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: ChicagoConservative27

How would he know? He sleeps during the hearings!


65 posted on 12/05/2019 8:44:28 AM PST by USAF1985 (ItÂ’s the Spanish Inquisition!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
This fat a@@@ole couldn't even SPELL "Constitution", let alone set himself up as its defender. He is a foul smelling ooze of utter corruption and filth. He would have served far better as understudy to the star of the move The Blob than polluting the halls of our Congress.


67 posted on 12/05/2019 8:48:47 AM PST by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Constitutional Treason = Democrat Party

Swing time to ensue


68 posted on 12/05/2019 9:15:25 AM PST by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Nadler said, “[T]his situation meets all three tests. The president committed impeachable offenses. They were important impeachable offenses. They go to the heart of our constitutional republic. They threaten the survival of democracy itself and the integrity of free elections. And the majority of the people, and of the House, I believe, understand that. Those are the three tests.”


While Nadler’s three part test seems to be a moving target, I don’t see how the test is passed in any one of his different versions.

December 24, 2018, on with Lawrence O’Donnell (5:00):

Number one, do you believe that you have real solid evidence the president is committing impeachable offenses?

Number two, are those offenses of sufficient gravity to justify putting the country through an impeachment process?

And number three, because you don’t want to tear the country apart – you don’t want half the country the next 30 years to say we won the election, you stole it from us. Do you think that the evidence that you have is so sufficiently clear and sufficiently convincing of deeds so clearly impeachable and necessary to impeach, that once you have laid it out, that you believe that once you have laid all that evidence out, an appreciable fraction of the opposition vote base will say they had to do this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aCq-47yAbM
August 5, 2019, with Mike Barnicle on Morning Joe (5:19)

Number one: can you prove the president committed impeachable offenses. Number two: are these serious impeachable offenses. And Number three: do you have the support of the American people. We will hold these hearings, we will get the support of the American people or we won’t. I suspect we will.

(snip)

If the people don’t support it, um, then maybe don’t go to impeachment, because you have to have public support.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQpspAklaos

December 4, 2019, closing statement at Judicial Committee hearing on impeachment (8:23:40):

Yes, the President has committed an impeachable offense.

Yes, the President’s alleged offenses represent a threat to the constitutional order.

Yes, we should not proceed unless some of the citizens who have supported the President in the last election are willing to come with us. A majority of this country is clearly prepared to impeach and remove President Trump.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?466833-1/hearing-constitutional-framework-impeachment


69 posted on 12/05/2019 9:42:53 AM PST by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson