Posted on 12/04/2019 7:13:37 AM PST by pulaskibush
Great reference. I had skipped ahead on thread and missed that very relevant summary.
Thanks for pointing it out, and the ignorance of the “ inquisitors” and “ witnesses” to consider this current requirement...
Post 196, please.
Seems to me these three legal eagles are making a big legal bozo no-no: All 3 are assuming facts not in evidence.
This idiot lawyer from Stanford just said we are a democracy. Since when?
Disregard. . .I already pinged you.
Apology.
One of the many comments on the Guam capsizing video:
“I lived on Guam for half my life. We had typhoons with 200+ mph winds and 40 foot waves and the island only capsized once. But we all hung on to the east side and flipped it back around quickly so we were all okay. Thank you Congressman for caring.”
I think Feldman is a “male feminist”. :)
Noah Feldman is such an ass!
He reminds me of an unfunny Gavin Belson from Silicon Valley.
Also, I notice Jonathan Hurley hasnt been asked a single question. I guess the Democrats dont think he will regurgitate their preordained talking points.
Trump isnt allowed to produce exculpatory evidence, to call witnesses, to cross-examine the Democrat witnesses.
And the Democrats have thrown out the presumption of innocence. Geez.
They honestly believe it!
Scary times
I caught that too. It is the communist narrative that we are a “Democracy” rather than a “Constitutional Republic”. This is tell all where her “objective opinion” is originating from.
That lie is starting to really piss me off.
Well now we are off to make one sided press statements before the Republicans can cross. Just like the Schiff circus...
keeps leaving turley out
None required. We all help each other and thats a great thing about this site.
What the hell is going on inside that turkeys head?
Two words from the constitution. “Executive Privilege”. And they are trying to say that he does not have that Constitutional right.
LOL. . .great one. . .he would have believed you if you told him that.
Yep. When the president says he can do anything he wants, he is speaking the truth regarding the house. It is the COURTS that tell him that he can not do a thing, not the house.
Rush intro monologue was one for the ages.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.