Nancy’s on drugs.
Perfect example of an evil villain.
I could see it now! Schittforbrains hammering his gavel incessantly the whole time! lol
sorry, Nancy, but PDJT respectfully declines to “present his case on impeachment”
since, once again Nancy, you are trying to turn everything in American law upside-down and inside-out for your personal advantage
reminder: it is YOUR (as the House of Reps) duty to “present a case for impeachment”... if you can
it is definitely NOT PDJT’s duty to do it!
and obviously Nancy, so far you have NOTHING criminal on PDJT, nothing at all. Not even a jaywalking ticket
Every opportunity... when? In the Senate?
Pelosi hasn’t operated in reality for decades.
To the left, if they don’t like reality, they make it up. They also make up crimes and laws and rules as they see fit.
They are communists.
Anti 5th amendment ... check
Bill of Attainder ... check
Time to start taking out the trash ... let me know
The only defense against invented crimes and false accusations is offense.
She is loco. Under the rules that she and Schiffhead have made, Trump has no representation.
WHAT CASE???
You have NO REASONABLE SUSPICION (RS) to even investigate.
You have NO PROBABLE CAUSE (PC) to search and/or seize.
You trample the Constitution and are a TOTALITARIAN TYRANT.
This is just like your phony and unconstitutional Russian collusion B.S. NO RS or PC.
You and your buddies continue to commit treason and one of these days you will have to answer for it.
IMPEACH AND CONVICT THE IMPEACHERS!!!
Right, except for when he does its called witness intimidation.
The commie left loves bringing up Nixon..what the left doesn’t want to talk about, is the evils of the Obama Administration and what they did..so they scream TRUMP, NIXON, etc..its a typical deflection tool
I just looked up Stupid and it’s a picture of Nancy
Just ask the b***h why SHE put these hearing’s in the intel and not judicial committee.....and watch her stutter.
President Trump isnt obligated to prove his innocence. Democrats have the burden of proving him guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
So far they havent met that burden. Nancy Pelosi has it exactly backwards.
How awesome would it be for him to walk in there with a mountain of evidence of their money laundering operation?
Then they are guilty of witness intimidation.