“I was referring to the fact that when the whistleblower filed the complaint, we had not heard from the whistleblower. We wanted to bring the whistleblower in at that time,” he said.
This creep is so transparent, he’s invisible. IF ONLY that was true - for our sake!!
As I’ve posted here in the past couple of weeks, I’m rereading David Schipper’s book “SOLD OUT” about the Clinton impeachment. Impeachment “”inquiry”” was not even spoken about BEFORE all the evidence Starr had released in tons of boxes to the House offices was accomplished and then it was to the House JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. A lot of you may recall the day the trucks pulled up to the office buildings shown on TV and unloaded box after box after box. That’s when the demonrats had no desire to even go to the room where they could read the evidence.
Schiff has no business even involving his committee in this matter and Nancy had no business allowing it to happen. It is not his job at the Intelligence Committee and that’s because there isn’t ANY INTELLIGENCE on that committee! OK, I made that up but it fits!
No, he just doesn’t want them to call witnesses at all.
What an ignorant excuse. First, witnesses are not precluded from making their testimonies public. Second, if these witnesses are so apt to shape their testimonies based on the testimonies of others, then they cannot be trusted to give truthful testimony in the first place.
Schiff is not very bright.