Posted on 07/23/2019 6:23:25 PM PDT by McGruff
SCOTUS held that the State of Missouri had the power to deny her the vote. As a part of the opinion, they noted that Virginia Minor, and others, were indeed Natural Born Citizens by virtue of having citizens parents and birth in the United States. But, you need to read the part that SCOTUS said that others might be Natural Born Citizens as well, but their status was in doubt. This case did not address that question. This is why this case does not support your assertion.
As both you and I have repeatedly said on this forum, the Supreme Court has indeed never said that other types of citizens other than a Minor sort of NBC citizen are not Article II POTUS eligible. And that is the dilemma.
Those of us who are concerned with the matter simply want the SCOTUS to exercise their Article III oversight on a constitutional matter and give the nation their opinion on who DOES constitute an Article II eligible citizen. They have never done so, and with the forces of globalism exerting their baleful influence, it is long past due for such a ruling.
Their unwillingness to do perhaps so raises more questions than those of the issue itself.
At this rate the anchor baby of an illegasl alien terroist will be said to be eligible too.
Harris isn’t qualified to be president because she is not a natural born citizen. Both her parents were foreigners on student visas saying they had no intent to remain in the USA, so neither were citizens at her birth.
It’s impossible for her to be a natural born citizen.
As both you and I have repeatedly said on this forum, the Supreme Court has indeed never said that other types of citizens other than a Minor sort of NBC citizen are not Article II POTUS eligible. And that is the dilemma.
Those of us who are concerned with the matter simply want the SCOTUS to exercise their Article III oversight on a constitutional matter and give the nation their opinion on who DOES constitute an Article II eligible citizen. They have never done so, and with the forces of globalism exerting their baleful influence, it is long past due for such a ruling.
Their unwillingness to do perhaps so raises more questions than those of the issue itself.
At this rate the anchor baby of an illegasl alien terroist will be said to be eligible too.
The Judiciary will not address this issue. They consider the natural born citizen clause as a flaw in the Constitution, an historical sort of non essential organ like an appendix, or the perview of the political sphere and therefore not worth their attention.
What our government can and should do is to revise the laws of naturalization and fix the error surrounding the anchor baby situation. A change in the law would provoke a challenge based on the 14th Amendment, so the Courts will get involved and I think that we can win this in Congress (after the 2020 election, probably) and we can prevail in the Courts. It’s a fight worth having.
Or a crooked court as happened at least one time I remember.
Neither one of them could hit the floor with a handful of grapes, much less be President.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.