Posted on 05/05/2019 7:14:58 AM PDT by robowombat
Interesting. Thanks for posting.
He’s a con man. He goes for whatever makes him money now.
Yo, Snoop-a-dope! Fair-a-Con was a TOKEN DROP, not just a token black. He had no real presence on Facebook of note, but Facebook dropped him so they could say, “SEE?! SEE?! Yes, we boot extremists on the left JUST as much as we do on the RIGHT! Move along, nothing to see here!!”
Note that Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and even Hamas is still active on Facebook and social media.
He’s a rich middle-aged man that lives in a gated community with children that haven’t seen poverty, missed a meal, nor went to one public school a single in their lives, but he still plays this “straight out of Compton” shtick to keep the hood kids tossing money at him.
Trash supporting trash
Here’s a 90’s era condemnation of the million man march from a British Socialist:
“In fact, it wasn’t really a civil rights march at all. Its theme was as conservative as any of the blame-the-victim rhetoric emanating from Newt Gingrich. The Million Man March was called by Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam, as a ‘day of atonement and reconciliation’, during which black men should take personal responsibility for instability and violence in poor black communities and for the breakdown of the black family.
“The programme of the march made no mention of the destructive role played by poverty, unemployment and discrimination. Nor did it make a single demand on the government—against racism, police brutality or massive Republican cutbacks against programmes for the poor. Its only foray into the realm of politics was to demand that blacks register to vote. Women were not invited to attend the march. They were told to stay at home.
“On virtually every social issue Farrakhan’s views echo those of the most conservative members of the Republican Party. He opposes the right to abortion, and argues that women belong in the home, taking care of children and housework. He attacks welfare as ‘subsidising single women to have babies’. He believes gay sexuality is immoral.”
Point being, he’s not really left-wing, he’s something else, a black nationalist.
Lots of lilly-white liberal women love the poop-dawg. He’s on some show with a lilly-white liberal woman. Can’t remember what it is now. But pretty stupid.
What’s next? Chicken joining Col Sanders Army?
Snoop Dogg? I thought he went the way of Tupac.
No; nobody shot him dead.
> BTW, who is he ??? <
Snoop is a charismatic rap singer with a long criminal history (including suspicion of committing murder). I realize that doesn’t help much, because most rap singers fit that description.
I don’t care too much for suppression of free speech whether I agree with what is being said or not. Farrakhan today... Tucker Carlson tomorrow. We need to protect ALL free speech.
No one is stopping him from speaking.
Funny how all these rappers support the Nation of Islam but do not live according to the Koran.
I have no idea what is happening with Facebook but it is interesting that The Black Panther Party and The Black Panther Party and The John Birch society both have Facebook pages operating. The Panther page seems a bit aggressive.
He has done shows with Martha Stewart of all people.
I find him trashy.
Who? Dog Poop? What?
Oh, how the media plays their games...
Pop quiz folks:
How many of you know Farrakhan was even ON Facebook before this public announcement?
Get it?
Facebook makes a public statement about a prominent figure who’s hardly on their platform at all.
...also an individual who has enough power to return to FB with one phone call.
Its all for show, folks. The solution (that I have been preaching to my fellow Real Americans): GET OFF SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS.
Just my $0.02
jimjohn - OUT
I think my DOG has more talent coming out of his rear, than Snoop Dogg does...
“Farrakhan was a token ban. The one guy on the Left who had to take one for the team so that Facebook wouldnt be accused of banning only pro-Trump people. I wouldnt be surprised if his account was quietly reinstated after this all blows over.”
Not necessarily. You know he was viciously opposed to Hillary Clinton and published some really nasty stuff about her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.