Skip to comments.
Notre Dame Cathedral fire being investigated as accident for now, prosecutors say
Fox News ^
| April 15, 2019
| Samuel Chamberlain
Posted on 04/16/2019 8:41:43 AM PDT by Leaning Right
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: GreyFriar
> I am NOT disappointed with Fox News reporting this story without, as of now, speculation as to the cause... <
Fair enough. But what I find very odd is that the French authorities have already ruled out arson. How is that possible, given that the fire occurred just a day ago?
I guess it goes back to the multiple-choice question I posed in post #1.
21
posted on
04/16/2019 9:09:33 AM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: moovova
To: Leaning Right
23
posted on
04/16/2019 9:14:29 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: bgill
DIVERSITY IS OUR STRENGTH.
Just keep saying it long enough and people will believe it.
Just imagine how weak we would be without all this diversity.
24
posted on
04/16/2019 9:14:46 AM PDT
by
Former Proud Canadian
(Trudeau never saw a gay pride parade he didn't want to join.)
To: Leaning Right
I suggest investigating it as a fire, and see where things take you.
To: Leaning Right
Rush is all over this right now....
26
posted on
04/16/2019 9:23:57 AM PDT
by
kjam22
To: pas
> Shouldn’t you just investigate and let the facts determine the cause? <
You would think so. Find the evidence, then draw a conclusion. But the French appear to be doing it in the reverse here. Draw a conclusion, then find the evidence.
27
posted on
04/16/2019 9:24:07 AM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: Leaning Right
They’re doing the French Mistake.
28
posted on
04/16/2019 9:25:16 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Leaning Right
C. They want it to be an accident. So it's going to be an accident. When they went for “C” while the building was still on fire it became very obvious that the authorities already knew with 100% certainty that it was arson by Muslims. They started trying to bury the truth before the rest of us could even reach any conclusions.
To: Leaning Right
Yes, your 3 choices are valid. And I can see that # 3 may very well be what is ‘decided upon’ by the French, whom no longer want to offend their mortal religious enemies.
30
posted on
04/16/2019 9:35:02 AM PDT
by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: Leaning Right
Get Inspector Clouseau’s cousin on it.. maybe ‘climate change’ in EUrabia is worsening.
31
posted on
04/16/2019 10:08:42 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
To: Leaning Right
have ruled out arson and potential terror-related motives Quick work, there.
32
posted on
04/16/2019 10:13:17 AM PDT
by
grobdriver
(BUILD KATE'S WALL!)
To: Leaning Right
Accidental? Arson? Many of us had a "hunch" it was Quasimodo.
33
posted on
04/16/2019 10:18:26 AM PDT
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
To: Leaning Right
They are admitting bias in an investigation. If it were a real investigation then they would have no opinion at this time. This tells us that the entire investigation is a sham. They have already determined what the final report must say.
34
posted on
04/16/2019 10:20:28 AM PDT
by
Revel
To: precisionshootist
if they are covering it up, then the notre dame was doomed long ago
35
posted on
04/16/2019 10:40:05 AM PDT
by
SteveH
To: Leaning Right
Let’s get a list of names associated with the work crews or anyone with that kind of access. Then I’ll let you know.
36
posted on
04/16/2019 10:42:12 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: Leaning Right
"No workers onsite. Who tf is this?"
pic.twitter.com/OPYFFMxkRf Vernon (@TipsyPianoBar)
Video of apparently Islamic person walking around Notre Dame as it burns.
The renovation crew clocked out at 530pm. The first alarm went off at 620pm, and was dismissed. The second alarm went off at 645pm. How was this a renovation crew mistake again?
37
posted on
04/16/2019 10:43:49 AM PDT
by
Teacher317
(We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
To: pas
Shouldnt you just investigate and let the facts determine the cause?Of course, and if it is associated with "work" being done, then let's see the list of anyone who had access.
38
posted on
04/16/2019 10:43:51 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: Teacher317
39
posted on
04/16/2019 10:47:46 AM PDT
by
Teacher317
(We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
To: Leaning Right
Yes, they want it to be an accident because they are afraid of the consequences if it should turn out that a Muslim started the fire.
We are supposed to believe it was an accident, just like the attack in Benghazi on 9/11 in 2012 was caused by a video.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson