Posted on 04/03/2019 5:18:16 PM PDT by Twotone
Gobbledegook....
A 200 stream buffer would be a huge deal around here. Then again, we have a lot more water than So. Cal.
I suspect it means you do away with local land use being decided by city councils and county commissions. The geniuses at the state level would accrue this power for themselves.
Not mentioned in the article is the misuse of Fire Codes and practices.
I sued our local Fire Dept for abusive intrusion into my property rights (a complicated issue that centered on zoning)
It has cost me $75,000 in legal fees and gone on. 5 years. I won at trial then they appealed (and they will lose again)
They had approved a project where I installed $160,000 of improvements then the changed their mind after it was built ( to code) and tried to apply other non existent codes to a business that had already been running for 15 years.
The appeal will be done in a few weeks and even though I will win, all that allows me to do is reopen my business that I had the right to do originally.
I will get no compensation for my loses. They are snickering at what theyve done to me. I have no recourse even after I win.
The local tax payers funded their attack on me
Thugs ... plain and simple
The fires of California are made more dangerous by oak woodland protections.
Live oaks, which are basically weeds have more BTUs per volume than any other American wood (yes manzanita burns hotter but not as long)
You can cut liveoak fire wood and it barely needs to cure to burn. 2-3 weeks its ready for an evil wood stove
Most counties have ordinances to protect oaks and collect money for your right to cut more than a few small trees each year. It is nothing more than a money generating enviro business.
What the enviros have done to wild lands is make them more dangerous
Granted there are oaks worth preserving but Not Live Oaks.
This is an old “planning” theory, if not practice, and if run well (in certain places), would preserve lands as nature preserves and allow the migration of wildlife around highly developed areas (where they are killed by cars, etc).
Now the question is whether it is a land “grab” and development stopping scheme or not. I haven’t seen anything on these types of “preserves/pathways” in about 10 years or more.
Wildlife near me in increasingly and destructively urban/suburban no. Virginia has made life fascinating for my family to watch (partially because there is a running path/trail along a nice “Run” body of water that goes from near DC to the more rural areas.
My sideporch breakfast and dinner group includes my two cats, my neighbor’s cat, a semi wild cat that might be a son of one of our deceased cats, one opossum (a hawk got the baby one), and at one time 5 raccoons (out of 8 - the five were living in my neighbor’s basement).
Looks like we lost two raccoons within the last year but the “mother of all raccoons”, about a 20-25 pounder, regularly eats the cat food, bread, etc. we put out.
One night he washed his bread in the cat’s water bowl, then sat in it while eating. I have pictures to prove it.
The little milk snakes got killed by lawnmowers or cats/dogs, and someone killed a huge Chipmunk the other day (They moved right next to our house - neighbors have a small dog, we have two cats and my other neighbor has cat, plus one or two semi-wild ones in the hood. We haven’t had a rat in almost 15 years (except one or two neighbors).
A coyote can be heard late at night, the silver/red foxes hunt all over the place (rabbits are having a hard time), and an occasional deer comes down the hiking trail for a drink at 7-11.
We have a pretty good wildlife management program (they relocate raccoons, deer, etc) but there are still enough for us to enjoy. After all before George Washington owned our neighbor/forest, they did.
Yeah, thats completely screwed up. You should be able to recoup damages.
“Sustainable” is the new term for soviet style 5 year politbureau economic plans.
I have no recourse even after I win.
Sure you do.
L
When a politician says “sustainable” the translation is:
“Citizen, shut up and obey your master.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.