Posted on 03/04/2019 8:42:40 AM PST by centurion316
Please, show me ONE time I denied voting fraud exists.
I have never once stated that, and the fact you cling to that shows me you mentally process data, with the same objectivism as those who cling to the Russia Collusion narrative.
Voter Fraud will not cost Trump 2020, and the reason is quite simple, Just like trump got nearly 300k more votes in PA than ANY republican who had ever run there, he will get even MORE, MANY MORE votes in 2020, as he will in every other state he won up here. Far more than even the “BEST” fraud will be able to create, and the simple fact you can’t see that, shows just how willfully ignorant you keep yourself on HOW and WHY Trump won in the first place.
The ONLY state that an argument can be made that Trump might lose up here, that he won in 2016 would be MI.. and even that is not likely to happen.
I know you think manufacturing 100k fraudulent votes, just precisely in the states you will need them, come election day is child’s play for the democratic machine.. but the reality is something completely different.
Fraud always has and always will exist, and it can definitely cost you local elections, but the fact you think its just so easy to fraud a presidential election, shows you truly don’t understand the process even at its most fundamental.
I would suggest, you at the very least, go watch this very very lightweight presentation of what the EC does, how it works and exactly WHY it makes stealing a national election so difficult
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6s7jB6-GoU
... Can it happen? Sure, as I stated the 1960 election is a prime example, but it is the ONLY example where you can make a reasonable argument that fraud cost the white house.
The reality is, Trump WON by not playing ROVE, like the GOP had done for 20 years, and laid it out there, now with a 4 year track record and the NeverTrumpers largely a joke, all those who did buy into their arguments, and stayed home or voted elsewhere will come to Vote for Trump in 2020 along with others who have seen that his policies are not the boogie man that Hillary’s camp made him out to be..
Dems are not going to be able to steal the election with fraud, because fraud is NOT as easy as you like to think it is, and even the best won’t be able to overtake the gains Trump is going to make over 2016.
World banks are setting up for a HUGE stock sell off during the election. Same as the recently did and did in 2008. They’re manipulating the market.
22,748 in WI, plus 10,704 in MI, plus 44,292 in PA. equals 77,744 votes. Clinton only has to shift half of those votes +1 or ~39,000 to her column to beat Trump. The trick is that every cast vote added to her column is one vote less in his column. So, any combination of under-counting Trump's votes and inflating Clinton's that equals 39K wins the election. Alternately, the Democrats could take simply "find" 23K votes in WI, 11K votes in MI, and 45K votes in PA and win that way. Either approach is well within their skill set.
I live in a urban blue area of Virginia which is a state almost entirely otherwise deep red. Every red county publishes its results promptly, while the four counties in my area, and the other blue region in Tidewater, delay reporting their results for days. It is transparently obvious that the blue counties are simply waiting for the red totals to come in so that they may know how many blue votes are needed to win, and yet I hear endless empty pontificating about how Virginia is now a purple state. I have no doubt that, absent fraud, it would never be close. This pattern is followed in almost every state where dense blue areas are are surrounded by red counties. Broward and Miami-Dade are two famous examples where fraudulent vote counting threatened to change the outcome of the 2000 election.
I confess -— I know nothing about economics, but haven’t banks been manipulating markets for at least decades?
I confess -— I know nothing about economics, but haven’t banks been manipulating markets for at least decades?
I confess -— I know nothing about economics, but haven’t banks been manipulating markets for at least decades?
The primary area their manipulating this round will be the banking system themselves. It will seem like a crash on the banking system and tech industry.
Thanks centurion316.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.