[mewzilla]

Hint: Those who don’t know are talking. And those who do know, ain’t.

[yoe]

"The main sticking point is how much money to provide for border barriers and what those barriers will look like." -- " however, and the barriers will be far less robust than the steel slat wall Trump favors.">

[Pollster1]

House and Senate negotiators are closing in on a possible border security agreement that would fund new technology, additional border patrol agents, and likely some kind of fencing in certain areas along the southern border.

I'm okay with fencing, as long as it is 40+ feet tall and made from steel-reinforced concrete.

[over3Owithabrain]

Trump,and Trump alone, has the entire Congress focused on border security, something they’ve avoided for decades.

Yet the crybabies and bitches are following their emaciated Bill Maher-loving goddess and crapping all over the man.

Pathetic losers

[Trumpisourlastchance]

No Wall/Barrier, no Trump reelection.

[Lean-Right]

Just my humble opinion;
I think Trump is setting this gang up
to expose their anti-American agenda,
knowing up front they’ll never come to an
agreement.
He has stated publicly, that he will
not settle for anything less than what
he’s requested. To turn on that, it will
make him look weak. You can bet that he
has plan B,C,and D lined up.

[Oatka]

House and Senate negotiators are closing in on a possible border security agreement that would fund new technology

"New technology" ?? Oh Oh.

[logi_cal869]

Just curious if anyone can explain why this post was pulled earlier. I found this thread while browsing or a duplicate or similar content. The NYT article addresses many of the same details, but exposes the left’s manner of propaganda.

The pulled thread:

Trump Gives Ground on his Wall as Border Deal Comes into View
2/8/2019, 11:55:57 AM · by lolligag · 119 replies
New York Times ^ | 2/8/2019 | Emily Cochrane and Annie Karni

To-wit:
This thread has been pulled.
Okay

I think it should be open for discussion, but the thread was not pulled as a duplicate: The NYT headline does not exist on FR.

I don’t care for censorship; I would rather have it tagged as fake news, if that’s what it is, rather than impeding comment on this “war of media” which is governing the current political landscape.

Otherwise FR has become DU redux.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/08/us/politics/government-shutdown-deal.html