Posted on 01/14/2019 11:08:57 AM PST by Lazamataz
Let’s install a breathalyzer for Congress to get into the peoples buildings. If it keeps them from making one drunken vote it’s worth it!
Does she have one on her car?
How about ankle monitoring devices on all citizens so when we need to find someone who’s committed crime, we can locate them.
After all, if you’re not guilty, what’s it matter? < /s >
>>A co-worker’s girlfriend had a breathalyzer on her car about two years ago. The things are now cellular-linked and have cameras built in, so each time the unit is activated it sends a report (with vehicle GPS location and operator photo) to the mothership. They monitor each unit and send the cops out if you violate the bail agreement.
And all drivers would have to pay for their cars’ monitorign systems.
Good gig if you run such a company and consumers are mandated to have to buy your product (even in the absencee of any crime or trial).
Yeah. Right after they require one on the floor of the House and Senate, to be used before each vote.
“Dem lawmaker announces plans to propose bill requiring breathalyzers in new vehicles”
next up: a device that requires your Democrat Party card to be inserted before your car will start ...
Sure, just add $1k to the cost of every car. And don’t forget that they need to be calibrated every month at a cost of about $100 in order to work. Oh, and everyone will have to wait thirty seconds for it to boot up every time they try to start their car. These people are truly idiots.
Good gig if you run such a company and consumers are mandated to have to buy your product (even in the absencee of any crime or trial).
Yeah, this would be like OnStar, but exponentially worse - and you can't delete it from the build sheet. Plus, it's another way to push people towards using mass transit.
It will raise the price of the car with something that could potentially malfunction and make the car unusable at an inconvenient time.
Ironic they don't feel that way about things that don't trample on the rights of the People - like stopping the deadly illegal invasion...why isn't saving "just one life" a good reason to build the wall/barrier?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.