What does she hope to find? Trumps’ tax
attorneys are probably the best in
the business, and have done everything
on the up-and-up to keep him out of
prison. I’m positive the IRS would have
red flagged any wrong doings.
Thanks a bunch Nancy for wasting my taxpayer dollars on this flight of your fancy. Bitch! Spit!!
I would note that Nancy Pelosi is 3rd in line for the Presidency, right behind the VP, so if the country needs to know the VP’s taxes, we need to know hers.
But seriously, congress can’t impose additional requirements for candidates for federal office, the requirements are listed in the constitution, and don’t include tax returns.
On the other hand, the courts have sadly supported unconstitutional rules about candidates spending money on themselves, and disclosure.
I want to see all of Obama’s shit unsealed.
When the Constitution was written there were no income taxes. They were only added to fund a war. That war is over. My money is none of their business and the Presidents money is none of their business.
I’m neither a lawyer nor a paralegal, but I’m pretty sure this proposal is unconstitutional and the Supreme Court has already ruled on a couple of very similar cases. In 1969 there was a case involving Adam Clayton Powell. (Powell v McCormack). Among other things the Court held that “In judging the qualifications of its members under Art. I, § 5, Congress is limited to the standing qualifications expressly prescribed by the Constitution. P. 395 U. S. 550.” In other words Congress can’t add new qualifications.
Better than that, however, is the more recent case (argued 1994, opinion in 1995) involving a petition from the people in Arkansas trying to impose term limits on its congressmen and senators. The case was U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v Thornton. Here are part of the words read by Justice Stephens when he delivered the majority opinion in that case:
“Over 25 years ago in a case called Powell v. McCormack we concluded that the qualification set forth in the text of the Constitution were exclusive at least in the sense that Congress may not supplement. Today’s cases present a different question than that presented in Powell, because the Arkansas Amendment was passed by a State rather than Congress.We are convinced however that the States as well as the Congress lack the power to add to the qualification set forth in the text of the Constitution.”
There’s an article dated May 23, 1995 in the NY Times about this case. The headline was “High Court Blocks Term Limits for Congress in 5-4 Decision.” I think anyone can get this article just by googling it.
I think it would be pretty hard to argue that forcing people running for office to provide a copy of their tax returns was not an attempt to amend the qualifications for running.