Posted on 11/24/2018 6:07:53 AM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
Viva La Mexico!!!
Some judge will be found to say that this imposes unnecessary burdens on Mexico, I’ll bet.
A plan with some common sense to it. Do it already. Then only allow 25 to 50 persons a day to apply for rntry and make sure they can be fully vetted before being allowed in for whatever reason.
Mexico already agreed to host the caravanners, by letting them into Mexico. We don’t have to offer Mexico anything, and shouldn’t. If the Mexican authorities decide to solve their problem by making it our problem, seal the entire border.
The 9th Circus court judge will quote “UN Authority.”
Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim needs to step up and show some $ loving.
They are on Mexican turf after Mexico opened their border door.
It’s their problem.
“Trump’s proposing that asylum applicants not be detained after their initial interview but rather turned around and sent to Mexico to wait while their application is processed. The statute doesn’t seem to allow that. He’ll be sued lickety split once the new policy is in place, which it isn’t yet.”
The last worthless Congress should have changed this
RemainS in meth-eek-O
Let Mexico, who allowed them in in the first place, bear the burden of their presence. It will sooner incentivize Mexico to knock it off with the wink and a nod invasion.
Oh, I agree it’s their problem as well as ours now. It used to only be ours, because of their and our combined policies.
They are used to migrant’s running through Mexico to the US like crap through a goose. Obama’s rules. And, they (Mexican workers, cartels, criminals, and government all) like the idea of a porous border.
This is a different story. They’ve gone too far for the golden goose (Orange Goose?) of the North, and consequently the immigration goose of the South is suffering from a painful blockage.
There is no statute that defines how many Shall be processed per day.
Likewise, the interview -”either at a port of entry or at such other place designated by the Attorney General.”
Mexico could be ‘that other place.’
Interview them in Mexico and the 90% that are typically rejected for a bogus claim can be on their merry way home in time for Christmas.
And give them free souvenir tee-shirts.
“I walked all the way to Tijuana and all I got is this lousy shirt.”
We will pay for it all anyway.
In the end a judge will block it and the SC has signaled it will not hear the plea. Roberts has spoken.
Sounds like 2 good loopholes to use ;)
Conduct the interview at the border. Our desk on our side, they stand on their side. Big red, white, & blue stripe down the middle between them.
Either that, or duct tape (h/t Les Nessman).
Whoever leaked to the Post should be prosecuted.
“Some judge will be found to say that this imposes unnecessary burdens on Mexico, I’ll bet.”
Probably.
But it’s high time we stop allowing these judges’ rulings extend beyond their own jurisdiction. It absolutely should not be.
I don’t see why the US doesn’t construct a bunch of circus tent sized structures at the border, completely wide open facing south and heavily fortified facing the US.
Whomever shows up gets their application taken and shown to one of these waiting areas. They’re welcome to wait for their hearing here (for as long as it takes). Because it’s open, they’re also free to leave any time they so choose - back the direction they came from.
No more catch & release.
Yes, that’s the answer.
Lickety split!
A term I have not heard in a coon’s age!
My father’s family used it, and I do not recall hearing it elsewhere.
A pleasant reminder of the old man.
Thank you.
If it's Mexican citizens, they are Mexico's problem, if they are OTM’s then Mexico shouldn't have let them in in the first place.
Mexico?!! Mexico is not our concern. Let Mexico deal with it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.