Posted on 11/03/2018 7:29:38 PM PDT by grundle
OK so the BB article talks about the whacko who claimed she was the Jane Doe. She was investigated and found not to be the Jane Doe in the letter. But apparently there is a woman, a Jane Doe, who Senator Harris has offered into evidence. This only proves there is another person wanting attention.
*** “Anyone who ever said that you have to “believe the woman” obviously never had an ex-wife” ***
I have one, but I also have 3 grown, highly intelligent children ... If she even thought about telling a Lie she would be skewered and she knew it... especially dangerous for her is that I didn’t want to Divorce and I had support from the kids...
Her NEW (#3) Husband is not as Rich as he USED to be and I actually do pity him because She Would/Will Lie Her ass off about Him and get away with it as soon as she thinks she can.
I really miss her /s
You pretty proudly hate all of my gender. Sad.
I don’t even think I heard of this accuser. Someone who accused Kavenaugh himself of actual rape? I don’t Remember this one.
The headline does not sound accurate. Her action is the thing that Donald Trump called a “damn disgrace.”
It’s “a damn disgrace” that politics has turned so intensely ad hominem. This is a sure sign of having lost view of God.
Now, move onto the others!
of course ex-husbands are always the perfect, little angels...
More of a misanthrope, actually.
And to be accurate, I dislike a ton of what your gender does at the approval and blessing of gynosociety. Not you, its what you do.
Q: “What about the other women?”
A: mister President, you’ll have the answer after firing Useless Sessions next Wenesday.
Amen.. we require wall funding now. Evidenced by endless caravans.
WE BELIEVE SURVIVORS!!!
((said the idiotic Democrats who don’t believe in due process))
This story exemplifies why “thou shalt not bear false witness” is one of the 10 commandments. In this life a person’s character and reputation is really all they have. Material wealth is meaningless and cannot buy your character and reputation back, nor can it defend against lies and slander. Character and reputation lives on even after the person passes, and can taint generations of your descendants. To destroy a person’s character is in a sense an attempt to kill their soul, and of course damages their reputation and ability to work and go along in the community. 1000 good deeds is often not enough to repair a damaged reputation, and people being they way they are will talk about and remember you for the thing that is most audacious. It is important to punish people who bear false witness and more harshly than we tend to do for these reasons.
Likely not, but we aren't inclined to make up stories about it. The ladies seem to specialize in creative fiction.
I have a feeling in two weeks we will have a conservative set of balls as acting AG. I keep telling myself there must be at least one set in the DC DOJ.
Likely not, but we aren’t inclined to make up stories about it. The ladies seem to specialize in creative fiction.
___________________________________________
Yes you are right. Instead of making up stories, you will simply dispose of her completely.
80% of all women murdered in the U.S. are by their ex-husbands, ex-boyfriends or current husbands or current boyfriends.
Sheesh!
ALL the allegations were lies.
Oh yes, no question: we are evil personified.
Excuse me while I post this month’s Alimony
and child support and court-required life insurance payment checks.
Be careful because if your outlook is negative, it might make you pay attention to the negatives around you more, which makes your life less pleasant.
What do I do that you dislike, using myself only as an example (since we don’t actually know each other outside of this piece o’ web)? I’m actually trying to understand, for reals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.