Posted on 11/02/2018 8:23:58 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
I have a very bad feeling that we are going to experience a “Kent State” or “Palestinian Intifada” moment at our Southern Border.
This is not going to look good in the nighttime news, but it will be great for ratings.
As Don Maclean used to sing: “Well this is life, this is prime time, this is news in the USA”.
I’m certain Trump will control the narrative on this with proof. My biggest concern is a coordinated rash of rioting in the US. Shooting invaders across the border is acceptable, shooting rioters is where the hearts and minds battle will take place.
Ramos can’t ‘see’ any criminals because he doesn’t have fancified, hyperspeed, super-duper facial recognition equipment. But we do. Oops, spotted another one!
LOL!!!
actually Chloe, it’s not. First five million academics, priests, elitists like yourself, communists, athiests, anarchists, mentally ill, handicapped, elderly rest home residents and journalists were rounded up - inside the country. Then, also inside the country, the Jews were rounded up. Nobody could get OUT. This, by contrast, is a case of not letting people IN. So, Chloe, not only are you ignorant, you’re just plain valley-girlwannabe stupid.
Right. If they have this much information about who is in this mob, they also know who’s funding this.
George is a FOOL......how would he know anyway.
bttt
STOP THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL legal arrangement known as a “Safe Third Country Agreement,” or STCA creating bilateral and regional immigration matters between Mexican and American officials
To the Right, American citizens are presumed innocent, people seeking to enter the country must prove they have a clean record. To the Left, Judge Kavanaugh is presumed guilty, along with any man accused of sexual misconduct. Cara-vaders are presumed smurfs and pixies until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of a specific crime, and it has to be something heinous.
Maybe I am dumb, but I am NOT seeing “evidence” in these articles. In order to have a decent conversation with leftists, I need more than “the Washington Times” or “American thinker” say they are convicted criminals. What are they calling evidence, I’m not being hyperbolic - I actually want facts to quote. Anyone got a link?
It’s not the American Thinker you have to refer to but WHO the article refers to.
So, you can’t use this article as reference but WHO THEY USE AS REFERENCE.
It’s the Department of Homeland Security they refer to and quote. Now, if you can’t believe the DHS with all resources they have at their disposal, who else are we to believe?
As for links, the article links to the DHS website and simply copies and paste what is written there.
I just went and looked at the DHS site. Thanks. But I know how the lefties would answer. Same as we would, if Obama ran the admin. It really sounds fishy, like hearsay, believe us because we said it. It doesn’t quote a source or sound specific.
For instance, did some official somewhere literally ask these thugs for ID and they had to pass through some portal with it? How do they know these hordes are the convicted felons? I definitely believe it, in fact I’d not be surprised if they gave jailed convicts in Honduras a job that will get them out, but the opposite side will not take that as fact just because the DHS says so. Would we believe the opposite if Obama’s DHS were all choir boys?
If we can’t believe the DHS, then I guess we might as well not trust our government for ANY data... GDP, Unemployment rate, crime rates, etc.
With this, anything goes. Where are the liberals going to get their numbers since they are the ones supporting more money for the federal government?
It’s not that I don’t believe every government posted fact, but the CDC outright lies about some issues so I know every word might not be golden truth. This DHS writeup sounds hearsay-ish. It doesn’t sound factual enough to even be a good argument for the leftists who think these are legit refugees.
“Sounds like” is also a very subjective phrase. We can’t go by feelings.
The DHS used the word “KNOWN”. Please re-read their statement.
The only uncertainty in their statement is that they don’t know how many more there are.
If we are to err (for want if a better word) we must do so on the side of caution. The main job of government is to protect its citizens from harm.
For them simply say, we must let everyone who wants to cross our borders in is irresponsible, not especially when we know (the word used in their statement) there are hundreds of criminals.
I’d like to know how “known” happened. Did they ever get screened anywhere? Why would Mexico let in criminals ($$)?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.