If justices followed the Constitution there would be no swing votes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-146 next last
To: yesthatjallen
Is there a problem with a conservative swing vote? Seems like the court will be just fine. Even better once Kagan, Sotomayer, and Ginsburg move on.
106 posted on
10/05/2018 7:35:15 PM PDT by
Reno89519
(No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!y)
To: yesthatjallen
Impeach her. She has no business analyzing what another Associate SCOTUS will or will not do in a Public Forum.
Talk about an unqualified SCOTUS Nominee, she and the other Obama appointed Woman Justice are stains on the Court.
108 posted on
10/05/2018 7:36:03 PM PDT by
Kickass Conservative
(THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
To: yesthatjallen
To: yesthatjallen
Imagine the tantrums everyone is going to have If Trump gets to nominate two or three more justices over the coming years. Consider that Nixon in 1 1/2 terms got to nominate five.
110 posted on
10/05/2018 7:36:39 PM PDT by
Reno89519
(No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!y)
To: yesthatjallen
She thinks that’s bad...wait until RBG doesn’t wake up from her nap one afternoon next month.
111 posted on
10/05/2018 7:37:50 PM PDT by
ameribbean expat
(Socialism is like a nude beach - - sounds great til you actually get there. -- David Burge.)
To: yesthatjallen
yea and? Your done and so are your supporters
To: yesthatjallen
Just wait till Ginsburg and sotomayor leave.
To: yesthatjallen
"If justices followed the Constitution there would be no swing votes."My thought exactly. 5 to 4 splits on issues show a inability to actually rule in favor of the constitution on a regular basis. Some issues demand a 9 to 0 vote. Not likely with liberals interpreting it. The sentinels of liberty should be looking through a clear lens.
116 posted on
10/05/2018 7:39:41 PM PDT by
Cannoneer
( "..raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair.." GW)
To: yesthatjallen
“It’s not so clear, that I think going forward, that sort of middle position — it's not so clear whether we’ll have it," Kagan said.I hope she is right.
117 posted on
10/05/2018 7:40:58 PM PDT by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: yesthatjallen
I have an idea, Justice Kagan. YOU volunteer to be the swing vote. Why should it be Kavanaugh’s responsibility? Let him vote HIS conscience, then YOU vote against yours.
To: yesthatjallen
"All of us need to be aware of that — every single one of us — and to realize how precious the court’s legitimacy is," she added. "It's an incredibly important thing for the court to guard is this reputation of being impartial, being neutral and not being simply extension of a terribly polarizing process." Bummer.
120 posted on
10/05/2018 7:45:29 PM PDT by
Seaplaner
(Never give in-never, never,never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. Winston Churchill)
To: yesthatjallen
121 posted on
10/05/2018 7:45:47 PM PDT by
comebacknewt
(Trump trumps Hate)
To: yesthatjallen
Kagan should resign then. In protest. Just like the deviant dems should boycott the senate vote tomorrow. In protest of course. There will another appointment before Trumps 2nd term starts possibly. Think this one was contentious? We ain't seen nuthin' yet. ⚖🍿🍻👍🏼🇺🇸
122 posted on
10/05/2018 7:45:58 PM PDT by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: yesthatjallen
Yea GOD!!!
Hopefully Trump gets even more SC picks.
123 posted on
10/05/2018 7:47:57 PM PDT by
b4me
(God Bless the USA)
To: yesthatjallen
maybe it will cut down on some of the wacky things the left trys to get to the SC to try to “fundementally transform” the USofA?
125 posted on
10/05/2018 7:50:27 PM PDT by
b4me
(God Bless the USA)
To: yesthatjallen
To: yesthatjallen
Eff the middle. Come on RBG, there is a bucket waiting for your shoe imprint.
128 posted on
10/05/2018 7:52:03 PM PDT by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.)
To: yesthatjallen
Well, step up gryl.
Roberts is too squishy already.
To: yesthatjallen
YES no more legislating from the bench this is a good thing Kagan not a bad thing ! our laws are based on the constitution not on the world court farce !
132 posted on
10/05/2018 7:54:24 PM PDT by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(;I'm not a psychopath, I'm a high-functioning sociopath. Do your research ~ Sherlock Holmes)
To: yesthatjallen
Well Kagan, instead of being a left wing stooge, you could be that swing vote.
Duh.
133 posted on
10/05/2018 7:54:41 PM PDT by
JPJones
(More tariffs, less income tax.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-146 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson