Posted on 09/30/2018 8:54:49 PM PDT by bitt
She described a proper forensic interview and got Ford to agree that it would have been fairer, easier and more accurate than the hearing was.
She then established, by Ford's own testimony, that Eschoo, Feinstein and both of her lawyers deliberately steered her away from a sensible and proper forensic interview, by never mentioning the possibility, and into the Roman circus of the hearing.
It left Ford with the inescapable conclusion that all four of those people had shamelessly used her and you could see it on her face.
Just for ha has, I did a google search to see how many of the mainstream medias were eager to report on this news:
Google search: Rachel Mitchell report exonerates kavanaugh
Guess what? NO mainstream medias reported on it! Surprised?
Mitch is talking about Rachel Mitchells’s letter on Senate floor right now. And she worked on Anita Hill’s legal team.
Somone should send the photo of the mystery woman taking polygraph to fbi or McConnell. Sorry I dont know how to do it. Did it come up when Mitchell was questioning? I recall her asking Ford if it was recorded
If that photo was submitted to the senate committee, somebody is likely to have legal troubles.
“I agree. It is a profile shot of her taking the polygraph, but it looks nothing like Ford.”
Looks like Monica McLean.
Your referenced article calls Ford a patsy groomed to take out Trump’s choice of Kavanough...shades of Lee Harvey Oswald!
You can kill more people, figuratively, with lawyers than with a gun.
You were spot on about a body double. Just not at the hearings.
Arthur Anderson is a great example of your comment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.