Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tea Party Terrorist

She will not show. Perjury charge is just not worth it.


2 posted on 09/24/2018 5:44:01 PM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: shelterguy

That will prove she was afraid of perjury charges and her accusation was a lie.


11 posted on 09/24/2018 5:46:39 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy

This. And even Collins was throwing some shade at the RATS today, was a good sign.


14 posted on 09/24/2018 5:47:17 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy

“She will not show. Perjury charge is just not worth it.”

Well, duh...
On the other hand, the Dems and Soroscrats would GLADLY sacrifice a pawn like here for a News Cycle or two.

I wonder if she realizes just how many years she could spend in prison, the moment she raises her right hand?


15 posted on 09/24/2018 5:47:32 PM PDT by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy

She will never, ever be charged with perjury no matter what she says.

She will not testify, however. She won’t come off well and the Ds know it. They’re going to continue using her as a foil to try to delay more.


20 posted on 09/24/2018 5:48:16 PM PDT by JamesP81 (Traitors are more dangerous than enemies. Vote and act accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy

“She will not show. Perjury charge is just not worth it.”

Her handlers told her to back off. The jig is up.


36 posted on 09/24/2018 5:51:27 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy
She wants:
To go last
To not be under oathe
To not have Kavanaugh in the room
To not be questioned by those who do not believe her

These are the demands of a liar...

37 posted on 09/24/2018 5:51:35 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy

So much evidence for a massive defamation of character and slander and libel lawsuit. Throw in all the top dems for conspiracy.


43 posted on 09/24/2018 5:52:40 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy

I can’t imagine that she won’t show. She has all of these lawyers, and this is her chance to be a leftist hero for the rest of her life, like Anita Hill. No one will will change her with perjury no matter how much she lies.


51 posted on 09/24/2018 5:54:38 PM PDT by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy
It's not the possible perjury charge. It's the fact that she's going up on stage all by herself. No lawyers and no corroborating witness.

She's going to be in front of the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. Senate...telling a freaken lie.

I think she will back out.

57 posted on 09/24/2018 5:56:53 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy

She will not show. Perjury charge is just not worth it.
______________________________________________________

You nailed it. (I mean that in the best possible way, not as a sex crime accusation.


63 posted on 09/24/2018 5:57:47 PM PDT by StAntKnee (Add your own danged sarc tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy

She’ll show but not be sworn in for testimony so she can feel comfortable is giving her story.


64 posted on 09/24/2018 5:57:52 PM PDT by damper99 (pu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy

She will testify. She has to now to get her check.

Also, what she says is a big nothing anyway. She can’t remember this or that..and Judge Kavanaugh will deny it and we’re back right here with nothing solved.


67 posted on 09/24/2018 5:58:45 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy

Who will charge her with perjury-it a regressive memory.I would like a list of questions which have nothing to do with memory.Did she write a letter accusing someone else of the same thing a few years ago?Top of my list.


90 posted on 09/24/2018 6:05:33 PM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy

I’ve been tempted to start a tracking thread of her progress across the country. Any sightings? She should have a tracking escort of reporters.


91 posted on 09/24/2018 6:06:58 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine ("It's always a party when you're eating the seed corn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy
>>>She will not show. Perjury charge is just not worth it.

LOL! You have a really unrealistic view of who the Senate Republicans are! As if they would EVER bring a perjury charge against her! We know FOR A FACT Hillary perjured herself and they did it...and NOTHING! Strok lied...NOTHING. They most certainly aren't going to throw a perjury charge at a woman who is claiming a sexual assault charge that is essentially he said-she said.

101 posted on 09/24/2018 6:12:18 PM PDT by NELSON111 (Congress: The Ralph Wolf and Sam Sheepdog show. Theater for sheep. My politics determines my "hero")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy

I’ve argued she doesn’t exist, and is really a caricature and elaborate hoax created by some very clever and devious democrat operatives.

My argument is - no one, except Feinstein and her cronies, has seen her or met her. We have one canned photo provided by the media, but otherwise nothing. No one has met or interviewed her friends, colleagues or neighbors. She is afraid to fly and doesn’t want any public interviews. The MSM is extremely uncurious about all of these things. They are only interested in the political narrative.

The reply to me is: the hoax is too elaborate. She has a significant online presence and history.

Perhaps, but my original speculation still stands. Blasey-Ford, if such a name and person does exist in some form, is merely a “composite character” created by the media, like Obama’s girlfriends. She only needs to be real enough for a political narrative.

As such, I still predict - we will never see her, we will never hear her.


107 posted on 09/24/2018 6:15:17 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy

It was never intended to actually get this far. This is a drive-by smear campaign and Ford is already at the end of her run. Ramirez will stay in the news for another day or so, but before her story falls apart, you can be sure another skank will come charging up to hurl feces and run away. All they are trying to do is prevent a vote.


116 posted on 09/24/2018 6:17:49 PM PDT by Ronin (Blackface or bolt-ons, it's the same fraud. - Norm Lenhart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy

“She will not show. Perjury charge is just not worth it.”

Agree she may not show, give the odds slightly less than 50 - 50 that she will. But, about a purgery charge; will she be sworn in? Haven’t heard one way or the other. I’m under the impression this will be an official senate hearing but more of an interview similar to what Hillary Clinton was granted and performed by Comey. She wasn’t sworn in for that.


120 posted on 09/24/2018 6:19:55 PM PDT by snoringbear (W,E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy

“...She will not show. Perjury charge is just not worth it.....”
Agreed. But it’s much bigger than just a perjury charge.
The female attorney that Kavenaugh has representing him is a fricken’ pitbull. When the dust settles, I’d be surprised if Ford even has an old, used pot to even piss in. There are numerous charges besides the perjury charge and she’s gonna get hit with all of em...and then some.


123 posted on 09/24/2018 6:21:44 PM PDT by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shelterguy
Nah -- she's not worried in the slightest about a perjury charge. In a he said/she said like this one, you'd never get a conviction that she lied. And there is absolutely no chance in Hades that Republicans would even attempt a prosecution for perjury. The political optics on that would be horrible if it could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, which it can't.

She's got other reasons not to want to testify.

First, it is entirely possible she will be asked questions about her own sexual history/background that she may not want to answer.

Second, she may be worried about other questions she may be asked for which she doesn't have a good answer. "Why did you scrub your social media presence"? "Is it true you wore a pink pussy hat?"

Third -- and I think this may be the big one -- she and her allies may decide they have more to gain from her not appearing at the hearing because it was "biased, unfair, and sexist to the core", rather than appearing, perhaps not doing well, and having Kavanaugh confirmed anyway.

Better to be a martyr than fall on your face in front of the whole country.

128 posted on 09/24/2018 6:24:51 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson