Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attorney for Michael Cohen backs away from confidence that Cohen has information about Trump’s...
Washington Post ^ | 26 August 2018 | Tom Hamburger and Rosalind S. Helderman

Posted on 08/26/2018 9:19:19 PM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

Cohen and Manafort off the front pages in hours/day, now what will the media cook up?


41 posted on 08/27/2018 6:58:45 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Attack of the Clintonoids!


42 posted on 08/27/2018 7:32:10 AM PDT by cgbg (Hidden behind the social justice warrior mask is corruption and sexual deviance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
"Attack of the Clintonoids!

Like a bad case of hemorrhoids, you just can't seem to be rid of them?

43 posted on 08/27/2018 8:07:15 AM PDT by Sa-teef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Chode

I really do not like that picture. Just saying.


44 posted on 08/27/2018 8:51:12 AM PDT by Rannug (When you're dead, you're dead. Until then fight with everything you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

Can someone answer a question I have about this whole Cohen thing? Particularly any attorneys who understand campaign finance laws.

As I understand it, Mueller and the left are claiming that he paid $300K to a couple of women. Initially we were told that the money was paid by Cohen, and thus was an illegal campaign contribution on his part to Trump. Now we are told that it was paid by the campaign, and constitutes an illegal use of campaign funds. I am also hearing different assessments of whether these expenditures were campaign or personal in nature.

Trump gave $66.1 million to his own campaign. If Trump had only given his campaign $65.8 million, and given Cohen $300K separately, which Cohen then paid to the women, that would have been perfectly legal, correct?

Whether it was a personal or an campaign expenditure would be entirely moot, because Trump could legally spend as much of his own money on his campaign as he wanted, and whether or not payouts were an in-kind contribution would be entirely irrelevant, right?

And, given the ownership structure of the Trump Organization, as I understand it, even if corporate rather than personal funds were used, it would only mean that the funds were not first disbursed to Trump, and then to Cohen, right? Roughly analogous to signing over a check, rather than depositing it in his own account, then writing a new check to Cohen?

How is this, at worst, anything more than an accounting error? Nothing changes the sources, or uses of funds; they came from the same place, and ended up in the same place.


45 posted on 08/27/2018 2:29:13 PM PDT by notloud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson