Posted on 07/15/2018 4:48:44 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
Not to mention Huma lying (proven by leaked emails) about the server and Strzok and his FBI pal writing she was telling the truth on the FBI 302 form.
The Deep State is trying to counter this.
They’re now saying the Russian “hack” of the DNC was far longer than they initially thought, so that gives them more timer to get the data over the wire. Also, a lot of the data could have been compressed before it was downloaded.
Assuming they used USB, the speed is 2.0 = 250 MBps and 3.0 = 650 MBps (these are my measured speeds, not the manufacturers lab speeds. Note I taught computer security for 20 years at Auburn Univ, before that 22 years USAF Comm-Computer Specialist).
WAN speed for the DNC was about 10mpbs, according to my sources.
Thanks.
Very informative.
When you watch, as i do shows like Homeland and others that feature computer wizards getting into stuff you realize that they are giving us an insight into the capabilities of “ deception” that are employed by all countries.
Shame that in ours ours it used against an elected official to create doubt and minimize the true US and World Leadership we haven’t seen in decades..
Amen, I could not have said it better! The very reason I keep researching, and try not to forget what I read last year, etc. Usually it comes in handy when something happens like Rosenstein indicting Russians, who could not possibly have hacked the DNC!
Have great day! Thanks, el
I L.O.V.E. this Sunday Morning thread...its like reading the Sunday paper years ago...but...TODAY has been amazing. Thanks Alas for faithfully posting.
Woah! Extra zeros!
should be:
2.0 = 25 MBps and 3.0 = 65 MBps
If you are talking about Navy Jack, all his stuff has disappeared. He said he’d worked in military intelligence. His postings suggested inside sources. He was very pro the Mueller Russian investigation.
The ATF and DEA shooters took only the thumbdrive he carried with him indicating that was all they were there for never to kill him!
In case you didn't hear what went down I'll do a quickly version of what "Luke" the secret source of Jack Burkman told some 20 journalists in Va. recently.
The two assailants had been waiting for Rich for some time.When they found him on the sidewalk after 4:00 am they did a pretty standard arrest telling him: "hands interlocked behind his head and get on his knees." Then the BS started. They started belittling him for being on his knees and making homophobic comments about him which continued the whole time they were there.
One agent shot him in the back/ribs whatever and Rich began crawling away.
He was shot again in similar fashion and then the thumb-drive removed. No attempt to make sure he was dead happened.
When police arrived one comment I read was that they walked Rich to the ambulance and by then he acted as if he had not been shot. No signs of it!
The rest has been documented over and over.
I missed it all. No telling how much stuff is out there. I think we only hit the tip of the iceberg sometimes....
ValJar is the queen bee. Born in Iran. Also Samantha Power (born in Ireland) is peeking through the weeds. She was the big unmasker
“NOT hacked. He explained the speed with which data was copied was only able to be a thumb drive from inside DNC. No outside source could have taken data”
Rush was saying the same thing on Friday. I think I heard it from Hannity quite a while ago. It’s not new news.
The analyst, a former intelligence officer, told Alperovitch that Falcon had identified not one but two Russian intruders: Cozy Bear, a group CrowdStrike's experts believed was affiliated with the FSB, Russia's answer to the CIA; and Fancy Bear, which they had linked to the GRU, Russian military intelligence.
The involvement of GRU had already been alleged at that time, long before the Mueller indictments.
Alperovitch then called Shawn Henry, a tall, bald fifty-four-year-old former executive assistant director at the FBI who is now CrowdStrike's president of services. Henry led a forensics team that retraced the hackers' steps and pieced together the pathology of the breach. Over the next two weeks, they learned that Cozy Bear had been stealing emails from the DNC for more than a year. Fancy Bear, on the other hand, had been in the network for only a few weeks. Its target was the DNC research department, specifically the material that the committee was compiling on Donald Trump and other Republicans. Meanwhile, a CrowdStrike group called the Overwatch team used Falcon to monitor the hackers, a process known as shoulder-surfing.
Shawn Henry no doubt had good connections within the FBI. I wonder if he was working with Strzok. Notice the Trump mention in an article that was written two weeks prior to election day.
Ultimately, the teams decided it was necessary to replace the software on every computer at the DNC. Until the network was clean, secrecy was vital. On the afternoon of Friday, June 10, all DNC employees were instructed to leave their laptops in the office. Alperovitch told me that a few people worried that Hillary Clinton, the presumptive Democratic nominee, was clearing house. "Those poor people thought they were getting fired," he says.
From what we know now, Crowdstrike's efforts were not that effective if you look at the dates of messages released by Wikileaks.
By the time of the hack, however, Donald Trump's relationship to Russia had become an issue in the election. The DNC wanted to go public. At the committee's request, Alperovitch and Henry briefed a reporter from The Washington Post about the attack. On June 14, soon after the Post story publicly linked Fancy Bear with the Russian GRU and Cozy Bear with the FSB for the first time, Alperovitch published a detailed blog post about the attacks.
The story was coordinated with the WP. It was all part of the set up similar to Steele briefing the media at the same time. It was all coordinated.
Alperovitch told me he was thrilled that the DNC decided to publicize Russia's involvement. "Having a client give us the ability to tell the full story" was a "milestone in the industry," he says. "Not just highlighting a rogue nation-state's actions but explaining what was taken and how and when. These stories are almost never told."
The DNC was orchestrating these stories.
The day after the media maelstrom, the reporters were back with less friendly questions: Had Alperovitch gotten his facts right? Was he certain Russia was behind the DNC hacks? The doubts were prompted by the appearance of a blogger claiming to be from Eastern Europe who called himself Guccifer 2.0. Guccifer said that the breach was his, not Russia's. "DNC'S servers hacked by a lone hacker," he wrote in a blog post that included stolen files from the DNC. "I guess CrowdStrike customers should think twice about company's competence," Guccifer wrote. "Fuck CrowdStrike!!!!!!!!!"
If you read the Mueller indictment and compare it to this article written in October 2016, it is almost a mirror image when it comes to the recitation of the facts.
Alperovitch initially thought that the leaks were standard espionage and that Guccifer's attacks on CrowdStrike were just a noisy reaction to being busted. "I thought, Okay, they got really upset that they were caught," he said. But after documents from the DNC continued to leak, Alperovitch decided the situation was far worse than that. He concluded that the Russians wanted to use the leaked files to manipulate U. S. votersa first. "It hit me that, holy crap, this is an influence operation. They're actually trying to inject themselves into the election," he said. "I believe that we may very well wake up on the morning the day after the election and find statements from Russian adversaries saying, 'Do not trust the result.' "
Were they trying to suggest that a Trump or a Hillary victory would be viewed this way?
Thanks for that clarification on Seth Rich, and your explanation is best I have heard. Evidently, Seth Rich had already given WikiLeaks receiver their copy prior to the shooting event. Must have had multiple copies of thumb drive.
I posted to PatriotsPride this link on impossible for Russians to have done DNC hack, it was inside job. The NSA whistleblower about this was on OANN News this morning explaining it again.
https://yournewswire.com/nsa-dnc-emails-leaked/
Enjoy your day! el
Many thanks for the list, AB. All on this thread should save it for future reference (under “Chicken Little, The Sky is Falling,we’re doomed,” etc.
In light of Rosenstein’s Russian indictments for Hacking the DNC, today, OANN News had the NSA Whistleblower on this morning! It is news! Because the Russians could NOT have hacked the DNC, due to the NSA guy’s explanation of it had to be inside job due to speed it was downloaded. He explained! Maybe OANN News has copy of news this am you can review!
The original story was 2017, however pertinent to lies of Mueller and Rosenstein now trying to blame Russians:
https://yournewswire.com/nsa-dnc-emails-leaked/
From your link:
Key among the findings of the independent forensic investigations is the conclusion that the DNC data was copied onto a storage device at a speed that far exceeds an Internet capability for a remote hack. Of equal importance, the forensics show that the copying and doctoring were performed on the East coast of the U.S. Thus far, mainstream media have ignored the findings of these independent studies [see here and here].
ValJar is indeed a player among leftist power brokers. She is maintaining a low profile these days and I am positive is plotting some nasty activity come November. So you and I definitely agree that Valerie is a threat. Another with his head down currently is John Podesta. Am I missing something or is he still on the radar screen?
You are welcome! :)
Sen. Sullivan was just spectacular. That guy needs to speak more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.