Posted on 06/29/2018 4:12:46 AM PDT by marktwain
But they never miss my can of shaving cream or my deodorant over 3.5 ounces.
An el cheapo .22 revolver loaded with shot shells works as well, probably costs a great deal less, and has less recoil.
I would expect the Judge to kick like a mule (caveat...I have never handled/shot one).
Why were “TSA pistols” in luggages?
Perhaps “TSA: Pistols”
would have been better.
Strip the gun into two parts and mail it home in two separate packages. Once you break it down it is no longer a firearm, it’s parts and not illegal to mail in the regular postal service.
You only need a dealer if the gun is functional. A frame without a cylinder, or a receiver without a barrel is parts. A pistol without a magazine IS still a gun, it is just considered unloaded. You could place a single round in the chamber and fire it.
We were arguably safer in 1965 when anyone could carry a firearm on a plane.
Ppl who make mistakes like this should be heavily scrutinized for owning guns. Idiots. Flame on!
Once you break it down it is no longer a firearm, it’s parts and not illegal to mail in the regular postal service.
It would be an excellent reform in the law, if functionality was required. But I do not believe it is.
Ppl who make mistakes like this should be heavily scrutinized for owning guns. Idiots. Flame on!
Everyone makes mistakes. No one is perfect. Some people think they are perfect, but it usually catches up with them over time.
I make mistakes all the time.
The only people who do not make mistakes are those that do nothing. That is the biggest mistake of all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.