Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Plans to Arm B-52 With ‘Mother of All Bombs’
Sput ^ | Jun 26, 2018 | staff

Posted on 06/26/2018 1:50:07 PM PDT by Eddie01

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last
To: FrankR

Loring was memorialized in that cool Wargames flick. “We’re still here!”
I worked a midnight shift back then and sure don’t miss having to remove quarter inch thick ice from my car so I could drive in from York Beach.


81 posted on 06/27/2018 5:49:08 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: blackpacific

“The 20000lb MOAB has been eclipsed by the 33000lb GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP)…” [blackpacific, post 78]

Neither will eclipse the other.

They are built differently: the GBU-43 MOAB is designed for use against soft targets - stuff & people out in the open. The GBU-57 is designed for use against hardened or deeply buried targets.

GBU-57 contains 5300 pounds of high explosive for a bursting charge. GBU-43 could be termed much more “powerful” in terms of explosive content, as its bursting charge weighs 18,700 pounds.

It might help to think of the difference between an armor-piercing artillery projectile, and a general-purpose artillery shell filled with high explosive such as TNT or RDX.

The confusion may stem from the only use of GBU-43 in action: it struck a cave complex.


82 posted on 06/27/2018 6:22:55 PM PDT by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Doc91678

“...Then there’s the possibility of modifying the bomb bay to accommodate the MOAB.” [Doc91678, post 79]

I used to conduct operational tests on a number of B-52 systems. Can’t be perfectly sure - I no longer have the exact dimensions at my fingertips - but I’d say there is not much chance of increasing the size of the B-52H bomb bay.

Front and rear main wheels are mounted to bulkheads and other airframe structural members immediately forward and immediately aft of the bomb bay. They cannot be moved. The upper interior surface of the bomb bay is tight against the bottom of a fuel tank, and that cannot be moved either.

The only other option is to use mounts attached to the underwing hardpoints. Munition size there is subject to fewer constraints, but - given the weight of the munition - there might be strength limits. Hence the potential requirement for modifications.


83 posted on 06/27/2018 6:34:15 PM PDT by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: schurmann

I was stationed at Malstrom AFB when we were still flying KB-29’s and KC-97’s. My other tour was in the UK near Brize Norton, Lakenheath, Greenham Common, Fairford and Upper Heyford


84 posted on 06/27/2018 11:13:42 PM PDT by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Doc91678

When were you at Lakenheath? I was in Jr High from ‘64-’67 when my dad was in the US Navy.


85 posted on 06/27/2018 11:18:32 PM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: WASCWatch

I was actually stationed at Burderop Park, 7505th USAF Hospital. We were the main hospital for all the bases I mentioned. I was stationed there from Jan 1958 to Mar 60. the 7505th was as large as Wiesbaden at the time.


86 posted on 06/28/2018 10:30:10 AM PDT by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson