Posted on 05/21/2018 8:45:51 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
Disinformation? From whom?
Trolling? By whom?
There’s another reason to insert bad grammar into Presidential text messages, and it has nothing to do with grammar.
“...citing two people familiar with the process...”
Who are these people? They are not the aides responsible for the tweets.
Two people who heard about it, possibly 2nd or 3rd hand?
Fake news.
by “two people who think this article is bullshit”
Because nobody EVER tweets fragmented sentences, right? Sigh...
There for a while, the Hill would print an occasional article that only crapped on Trump in a half-hearted manner. They must have been accused of being a Trumpist.
It’s not unheard of for a very famous person who is very busy to designate certain mundane duties to faceless subordinates.
So all the hyper-hysterics about Trumps tweets is B.S. They don’t know if it is human or underlings.
Trump makes a deliberate mistake in a policy tweet and the LSM talk about it the entire next day. That “mistake” got the message out to the public all day, the public being more then the three people watching CNN. I will deliberately spell something wrong in order for my students to remember it.
It is called twitter for a reason.
It’s The Boston Globe-——ignore it.
.
What a stoopud notion.
The Hill likes to report water cooler gossip as “news”.
I must say that I am extremely jealous of these people who place a choice of Tweets in front of trump. They must have a blast doing it, especially since they likely throw in one or two that no one intends to actually tweet, but just to provide some comic relief.
“It’s The Boston Globe-——ignore it.”
.
You are right. I already have.
Ha! How long did that covfefe thing have the left-wing media going batshit crazy? Weeks? I would deliberately misspell things too if I were Trump, just to troll them.
As much as we would like to believe that every book, speech, letter, and now tweets are written by the folks we look up to - they aren’t. But they DO get that person’s point across, and with their mannerisms. I loved Peggy Noonan’s book “What I saw at the Revolution” when she was a young speech writer for Reagan.
Very interesting process.
BTW - anything in a speech became “official USA policy”, so they had to be vetted by all the various folks. Reagan had originally put in the line (in his words) about “tear down this wall”. It came back and that part didn’t fit our policy, so was deleted. Reagan would put it back in along with other changes. The sixth or seventh revision and final version got handed to Reagan in the limo on the way to the speech. Reagan once again had to write in that line that the policy folks had deleted! Thank God!!
I thought he tweeted in his PJs while watching Fox and Friends.
More unamed sources.
“Reagan once again had to write in that line that the policy folks had deleted! Thank God!!”
One of the best lines in history.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.