So I speak as a novice....not even a novice but just a guy who tries to look at stuff with an objective eye.
This sounds like the 13 indictments were for show. Nothing substantial to prove, but easy to indict since the "bad guys" are thousands of miles away and will never subject themselves to an American court of law.
The judge may realize that is indeed a witch hunt and isn't going to let Mueller pussyfoot around any more.
Thoughts?
Could the judiciary be one place that is coming to reflect the opinion of many Americans who are sick of this never ending BS?
Headline is incorrect. Does not match article being linked. Word “small” should be deleted.
Q predicted this!
(in before a Qook states it lol)
It would be quite the irony if it was found that Mueller had a hand in the mischief ther U.S.played in Israel’s 2015 elections. The Obama administration. led by Secretary of State John Kerry, illegally intervened when they attempted to defeat the reelection of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by covertly funneling State Department grants to opposition groups. As with most investigations of Obama scandals, emails documenting this illegal election activity were destroyed. And, as usual, no one was held accountable.
Where did ya get the title to the thread? It’s not what the article at the link says.
a Trump appointed Judge .. bet a lot of folks never thought they’d live to see one. Dabney.. Give em heck!!
Another judge denies:
“Judge Rejects Mueller’s Request for Delay in Russian Troll Farm Case”
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/04/mueller-russia-interference-election-case-delay-570627
btt
Yep - didn’t expect any interaction because they could ignore the charges with impunity but they started asking for proof of the charges and Mueller has no proof...
Mueller’s showboating to keep the “Russian Collusion” narrative in the press, now opens sensitive US intelligence sources and methods to legal discovery by the actual Russian Government.
This charade is now endangering our intelligence capabilities, as well as our constitutional system and rule of law.
Rosenstein held a press conference to announce these charges - he needs to go as well as Mueller.
In America, in 2018, a war is being fought with judges.
This week, for the first time the large caliber artillery judges are firing directly on target.
No, because most of them are of the ruling class.
However, since the truth is on our side and it's simple for one honest man to destroy a tower of lies - we only need a few life-tenured Federal judges in the correct venue to proclaim the law - we may get by anyway.
3. The Special Counsel's motion is in violation of Local Criminal Rule 47(b) in that its contains no citation to points of law and authority and instead proclaims without citation to any authority that "A criminal case against an organizational defendant ordinarily requires that the defendant has been properly served with a summons in order for the court to be assured that the defendant has submitted to the jurisdiction of this court and has obligated itself to proceed in accordance with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and other applicable laws that govern this criminal proceeding," Mot. at 3, and that "Acceptance of service is ordinarily an indispensable precondition providing assurance that a defendant will submit to the jurisdiction of the court, obey its orders, and comply with any judgment." Id. at 4. If the Special Counsel believes these statements to be true she should: (a) provide the legal authority, and (b) act in accordance with the requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 4. ...6. Defendant voluntarily appeared through counsel as provided for in Fed. R. Crim. P. 43(b)(1), and further intends to enter a plea of not guilty. Defendant has not sought a limited appearance nor has it moved to quash the summons. As such, the briefing sought by the Special Counsel's motion is pettifoggery. See United States v. Kolon Industs. Inc., 926 F. Supp. 2d 794, 798 (E.D. Va. 2013) (noting that voluntary appearance by a defendant can give rise to jurisdiction).
7. Defendant is entitled to a Speedy Trial, see 18 U.S.C. 3161, and the Special Counsel's motion has no legitimate purpose and will create unnecessary delay.
8. As required by Local Criminal Rule 16.1, Defendant sought discovery from the Special Counsel 2 1/2 weeks ago and the Special Counsel has not extended the common courtesy of providing any reply whatsoever.
See too ...
Motion for Continuance - US v. Internet Research Agency - DC Case 1:18-cr-00032-DLF
Docket for United States v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC, 1:18-cr-00032
Hip, hip, HOORAY!!!