Skip to comments.
The downside of police being able to seize people’s guns
Crime Prevention Research Center ^
| April 20, 2018
Posted on 04/23/2018 8:40:44 PM PDT by rogerantone1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: rogerantone1
"Im like, Im like, and I'm like, Im like, Im like, Im like,..." Is this an educated person speaking?
21
posted on
04/24/2018 5:55:25 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Perhaps we should care less about who we may offend and care more about who we may inspire.)
To: rogerantone1
Mistake #1. choosing to live in California.
To: T-Bone Texan
I was commenting on what I thought was a portmanteau of “husband” and “bank” (= husbank).
Perhaps not.
23
posted on
04/24/2018 7:37:47 AM PDT
by
Moltke
(Reasoning with a liberal is like watering a rock in the hope to grow a building.)
To: Moltke
“Huabank” is indeed clever!
24
posted on
04/24/2018 8:52:19 AM PDT
by
T-Bone Texan
(Idiocracy is here, and it votes democrat.)
To: Secret Agent Man
Yup, she married him for his money and now wants to close out the account.
25
posted on
04/24/2018 12:48:06 PM PDT
by
ViLaLuz
(2 Chronicles 7:14)
To: Larry Lucido
Oh, I get it, they took his gun to PROTECT him from himself.
Aren’t we lucky to have police agencies which can carry out such operations? Wonder how much more than $100,000 was spent on this debacle?
26
posted on
05/26/2018 4:03:11 PM PDT
by
arrogantsob
(See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson