Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There Is No Such Thing As ‘Newsworthy’ Exception To Attorney-Client Confidentiality
Townhall.com ^ | April 21, 2018 | Marina Medvin

Posted on 04/21/2018 5:27:29 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 04/21/2018 5:27:29 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Man, if only we could elect republicans to hold the con-gre$$, we’d show ‘em who’s boss!


2 posted on 04/21/2018 5:39:25 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST (Apparently I voted demoncrat for 40 years. They all wore 'R' jerseys! 'R'atpublicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackbirdSST

Instead, we have gutless coward RINOcrats in charge of Congress.


3 posted on 04/21/2018 5:45:00 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The issue with attorney client privilege is ATTORNEYS.
Judges are attorneys. They pretzel the law to their political (financial) benefit.
They mock the law and create distrust.
This won’t go on much longer.


4 posted on 04/21/2018 5:46:52 AM PDT by Ramcat (Thank You American Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hillary Clinton’s attorneys got immunity, Trumps get raided. This is a travesty!


5 posted on 04/21/2018 5:49:02 AM PDT by Lawgvr1955 ( Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There’s a fraud exception to this which is apparently what they used to justify it.


6 posted on 04/21/2018 5:51:25 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

L8r


7 posted on 04/21/2018 5:56:13 AM PDT by preacher ( Journalism no longer reports news, they use news to shape our society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

According to the article, they argued a public right to know without any claim of fraud being made.


8 posted on 04/21/2018 6:05:54 AM PDT by Bob (Damn, the democrats haven't been this upset since Republicans freed their slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bob

What, you want me to start actually reading the articles now?


9 posted on 04/21/2018 6:23:01 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I am at a loss as to why Judge Wood even allowed the Media lawyer to make any argument at all. As soon as he identified his clients, it was clear he was not a party to the case before her. He had no business even being in the court room.

* She allowed a party with no standing to make an argument in a criminal case.

Even worse, the argument was to breach the Attorney-Client privilege for no purpose other than to help the news media and embarrass a private citizen who was no party to the criminal proceeding.


10 posted on 04/21/2018 6:33:43 AM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Lookout journalists, you’re next. The privilege assumption for any professional is over.


11 posted on 04/21/2018 6:41:53 AM PDT by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramcat

This is all just a game to lawyers. Never mind that mere peons often suffer from their sport. Lawyers make the laws then defend and prosecute the accused lawbreakers under the careful supervision of the head lawyer, a judge. What a system. The best a peon can hope for is to not get caught up in the so-called justice system since your life, your livelihood, your freedom may depend on it. Shakespeare had it right.


12 posted on 04/21/2018 6:43:17 AM PDT by lakecumberlandvet (Appeasement never works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lawgvr1955

Great point on immunity deals. The news channels including Fox missed that very important point


13 posted on 04/21/2018 6:44:46 AM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

I am at a loss as to why Judge Wood even allowed the Media lawyer to make any argument at all. As soon as he identified his clients, it was clear he was not a party to the case before her. He had no business even being in the court room.

* She allowed a party with no standing to make an argument in a criminal case.

Even worse, the argument was to breach the Attorney-Client privilege for no purpose other than to help the news media and embarrass a private citizen who was no party to the criminal proceeding.

********************

What stuns me is that Judge Wood could have taken the argument under consideration and made the decision about whether to make the client list public at another time. In the mean time, she could have kept the name(s) sealed so the current case could move forward, and make a more researched and thoughtful decision on the CNN’s lawyer’s argument about whether the public had a right to know the name(s).

She instead immediately had the name released in open court. She can not un-ring that bell. Incredibly irresponsible.


14 posted on 04/21/2018 7:21:54 AM PDT by leftcoaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
I am at a loss as to why Judge Wood even allowed the Media lawyer to make any argument at all.

islamidemocommunism

15 posted on 04/21/2018 7:24:45 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I would have refused to comply with the judge’s order and cite attorney-client privilege as my authority for doing so. I believe that the order was ultra-vires.


16 posted on 04/21/2018 7:37:08 AM PDT by myerson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

How many of these media members have attorneys?

How many have been married more than once & records of their divorce proceedings are available?

How many of them would like to see their entire liegal life laid out on the internet & media without any attorney/client privilege?

NONE of them.

But they think nothing of cannabalizing another person’s life-—even when there is no basis for doing so.

Reminds me of the wrongful accusations against Richard Jewell & his actions during the Atlanta Olympics.


17 posted on 04/21/2018 7:44:25 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Kimba Wood needs to be removed from the bench-—permanently.


18 posted on 04/21/2018 7:45:11 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

It could be inferred that the change of heart either benefited Judge Wood in some way, or prevented personal damage to her standing in some way. In any event, Robert Balin had the goods to metaphorically twist her arm to gain cooperation.


19 posted on 04/21/2018 8:10:29 AM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Same playbook as breaking open the Jack Ryan sealed records to elect BHO (2004) in Illinois.


20 posted on 04/21/2018 8:18:36 AM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson