Pontification and conjecture. But worth noting, anyway.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: Eleutheria5
"But to take chemical weapons and kill hundreds of children from your own side, is way beyond even the satanic practices of the Middle east". How does he know that:
1) The children were killed? As opposed to playing dead for the cameras?
2) There were "hundreds"?
3) That any who were dead were from their "own side", as opposed to captured family members of the opposition. ISIS showed no hesitation in killing women and children.
61 posted on
04/13/2018 5:10:00 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
To: Eleutheria5
Giant problem with the Middle East expert Dr. Mordechai Keda’s opinion. It is all theoretical reasoning, speculating about motives but he makes no opinion on hard chemical attack evidence, pro or con. Not a substantial argument.
70 posted on
04/13/2018 6:51:02 AM PDT by
Wuli
To: Eleutheria5
It is time we stop fighting the UK wars in the Middle East.
76 posted on
04/13/2018 8:39:23 AM PDT by
bmwcyle
(People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
To: Eleutheria5
Does anyone buy this baloney?
To: Eleutheria5
Super secret Iranian chlorine. Ooooooooookay.
79 posted on
04/13/2018 8:44:19 AM PDT by
The Toll
To: Eleutheria5
98 posted on
04/15/2018 7:27:56 AM PDT by
HollyB
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson