Posted on 02/27/2018 12:26:55 PM PST by Kaslin
This speech was relevant at a Sports Analytics Conference WHY, exactly??
SimpliSafe nastily dumped the NRA cuz of Parkview:
How many ads for SimpliSafe did we hear on Rush today, hmmm..?
ZERO...!
Let’s hope it STAYS that way.
The myth of an era of unity that the DNC MSM is now creating. We were a little more unified in a sense because the left had to play things that way, but different opinions were still everywhere. There were many newspapers and magazines dealing with social and political issues, and people would join organizations and then get newsletters from them through the mail.
“And the command went out that Obamas speech was to be off-the-record, that nobody but nobody was to record it. Nobody but nobody was to report it!”
He’s already been President, so why? So he can give it again for a similar price, or for some other reason.
I don’t understand the secrecy. Everything I’ve seen so far has been standard Obama crap.
Obama was making a not too veiled threat to free speech. A lot of high sounding rhetoric, but he might just as well have been saying “Neo Nazis can buy a newspaper so we really need to control newspapers.”
Parkview?
The #FakeNews secrecy by Obama was explained above. It was simply a marketing gimmick to draw more attention and suspense. Of course he knew that a conference with a bunch of journalists was not going to keep his remarks “private” for long. It is just another form of hype.
Because it was part of a criminal conspiracy.
Brought to you by the transparency president. He’s transparent alright. I can see right through him.
Oh please! Trying to make some sort of big deal about one of Zero’s teleprompter readings is like having a news event about somebody taking a dump. Spare us.
Trying to hide the biggest threat in the middle.
The algorithms apply to every search browser.
Changing them changes how any search progresses and what results/returns you get.
To create the 'common' conversation you first have to control every conversation.
Same old playbook really.
Not at all true, judging by who the other speakers were.
And ... "Negroes"?
[Obamas speech was to be off-the-record, that nobody but nobody was to record it. Nobody but nobody was to report it!
Because it was part of a criminal conspiracy.]
Exactly. We honest straight people have almost no idea of how much criminal conspiracy there is in our country. Nor how powerful it is.
But thanks to the web and FReerepublic we’re learning.
He probably caught a couple of million for saying nothing of substance.
Just like the 60 million advance on his memoirs.
Does ANYONE think he will sell about 200 zillion copies to recoup that?
No way.
It's simply a not-so obvious way of laundering money to Obama.
They want to use the Fairness Doctrine in a way it was never intended. They want to turn it into the equal-time doctrine.
= = =
OK.
At the start of the show say, “This first hour and a half is dedicated to Obama.”
Then continue on as usual.
At the end of that time say, “This hour and a half was dedicated to Obama.”
Equal time, right?
still a voice of reason!
“Not at all true, judging by who the other speakers were.”
I said “perhaps” because I was offering a speculation. And...can one judge that based on the identities of the other speakers?
“And ... “Negroes”?
That’s right, or any other term except whichever one they’re insisting on this week.
I spent most of my life catering to their BS. I’m done.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.