Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Secret Speech About Me
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | February 27, 2018 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 02/27/2018 12:26:55 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 02/27/2018 12:26:56 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This speech was relevant at a Sports Analytics Conference WHY, exactly??


2 posted on 02/27/2018 12:33:27 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

SimpliSafe nastily dumped the NRA cuz of Parkview:

How many ads for SimpliSafe did we hear on Rush today, hmmm..?

ZERO...!

Let’s hope it STAYS that way.


3 posted on 02/27/2018 12:35:04 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The myth of an era of unity that the DNC MSM is now creating. We were a little more unified in a sense because the left had to play things that way, but different opinions were still everywhere. There were many newspapers and magazines dealing with social and political issues, and people would join organizations and then get newsletters from them through the mail.


4 posted on 02/27/2018 12:36:41 PM PST by Faith Presses On (Above all, politics should serve the Great Commission, "preparing the way for the Lord.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“And the command went out that Obama’s speech was to be off-the-record, that nobody but nobody was to record it. Nobody but nobody was to report it!”

He’s already been President, so why? So he can give it again for a similar price, or for some other reason.


5 posted on 02/27/2018 12:38:33 PM PST by Faith Presses On (Above all, politics should serve the Great Commission, "preparing the way for the Lord.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I don’t understand the secrecy. Everything I’ve seen so far has been standard Obama crap.


6 posted on 02/27/2018 12:42:49 PM PST by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama was making a not too veiled threat to free speech. A lot of high sounding rhetoric, but he might just as well have been saying “Neo Nazis can buy a newspaper so we really need to control newspapers.”


7 posted on 02/27/2018 12:42:51 PM PST by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Parkview?


8 posted on 02/27/2018 12:44:52 PM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg

The #FakeNews secrecy by Obama was explained above. It was simply a marketing gimmick to draw more attention and suspense. Of course he knew that a conference with a bunch of journalists was not going to keep his remarks “private” for long. It is just another form of hype.


9 posted on 02/27/2018 1:23:14 PM PST by Enchante (FusionGPS "dirty dossier" scandal links Hillary, FBI, CIA, Dept of Justice... "Deep State" is real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Obama’s speech was to be off-the-record, that nobody but nobody was to record it. Nobody but nobody was to report it!

Because it was part of a criminal conspiracy.

10 posted on 02/27/2018 1:43:26 PM PST by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be defeated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Kaslin

Brought to you by the transparency president. He’s transparent alright. I can see right through him.


12 posted on 02/27/2018 2:04:54 PM PST by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Oh please! Trying to make some sort of big deal about one of Zero’s teleprompter readings is like having a news event about somebody taking a dump. Spare us.


13 posted on 02/27/2018 2:07:50 PM PST by pt17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
“We have to have a serious conversation about what are the business models, (an ; instead of a comma?) the algorithms, the mechanisms whereby we can create more of a common conversation.”

Trying to hide the biggest threat in the middle.
The algorithms apply to every search browser.
Changing them changes how any search progresses and what results/returns you get.

To create the 'common' conversation you first have to control every conversation.

Same old playbook really.

14 posted on 02/27/2018 2:07:53 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc
Perhaps because the attendees were primarily—or entirely—Negroes.

Not at all true, judging by who the other speakers were.

And ... "Negroes"?

15 posted on 02/27/2018 2:07:55 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

[Obama’s speech was to be off-the-record, that nobody but nobody was to record it. Nobody but nobody was to report it!
Because it was part of a criminal conspiracy.]

Exactly. We honest straight people have almost no idea of how much criminal conspiracy there is in our country. Nor how powerful it is.

But thanks to the web and FReerepublic we’re learning.


16 posted on 02/27/2018 3:14:15 PM PST by sciencewriter86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pt17
No, it's just the powers that be giving a generous gift to Obama.

He probably caught a couple of million for saying nothing of substance.

Just like the 60 million advance on his memoirs.

Does ANYONE think he will sell about 200 zillion copies to recoup that?

No way.

It's simply a not-so obvious way of laundering money to Obama.

17 posted on 02/27/2018 4:30:31 PM PST by boop (Top men are on the case. "Who are they?" I said TOP men. End of discussion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They want to use the Fairness Doctrine in a way it was never intended. They want to turn it into the equal-time doctrine.
= = =

OK.

At the start of the show say, “This first hour and a half is dedicated to Obama.”

Then continue on as usual.

At the end of that time say, “This hour and a half was dedicated to Obama.”

Equal time, right?


18 posted on 02/27/2018 5:17:49 PM PST by Scrambler Bob (You know that I am full of /S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; ransomnote; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; ...

still a voice of reason!


19 posted on 02/27/2018 5:45:22 PM PST by bitt (We dont need an electric chair, we need electric bleachers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x

“Not at all true, judging by who the other speakers were.”

I said “perhaps” because I was offering a speculation. And...can one judge that based on the identities of the other speakers?

“And ... “Negroes”?

That’s right, or any other term except whichever one they’re insisting on this week.

I spent most of my life catering to their BS. I’m done.


20 posted on 02/27/2018 6:34:57 PM PST by dsc (Our system of government cannot survive one party control of communications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson