Posted on 01/31/2018 2:26:17 PM PST by jazusamo
Oh, what nonsense. Trump’s comments have been neither “extreme” nor “vicious,” and “recurring” only in the most general sense of “more than one.”
it’s a hail mary to try to get it under equal protection as viewed from the far left
of course to the more moderate, let alone the right, that’s silly because who’s going to sneak in from mexico. finns?
No one noting that, in fact, Norway has far better demographics than the $..hold countries. OR that POTUS had met with the Norweigian PM the day before that comment was made.
This is not about ‘Latino’ or ‘Hispanic’. This is about having a fair and balanced immigration policy that strengthens the US, and about preserving the sovereignty of our nation by protecting our borders and stopping illegal immigration. For many years now Hispanics have been favored in immigration, including chain migration, over many other groups. It’s not like they were discriminated against.
According to Pew:
There were 56.5 million Hispanics in the United States in 2015, accounting for 17.6% of the total U.S. population (and this doesn’t include illegal immigration). In 1980, with a population of 14.8 million, Hispanics made up just 6.5% of the total U.S. population. Despite that huge increase, the Democrats don’t want there to be any slow down of immigration, don’t want an end to chain migration, and they don’t want illegals deported. Instead, they make inflammatory racist remarks (e.g. “Trump wants to make America White again). The irony is that if they thought Hispanics would be Republican voters, they’d push for a moratorium on Hispanic immigration tomorrow.
“The March deadline is fast approaching.”
The media and the establishment are saying there is a March deadline for DACA. That is a lie. A radical federal judge in San Francisco put a hold on ending it. The SC has the case and will not rule until June. The REAL deadline is sometime in June.
“Despite Trump’s six-month window, Democrats still railed against his callous move. How could he threaten children who came here illegally as minors? “
A very simple question needs to be asked, based in part on my suspicion that the majority of DACA “dreamers” were brought here by their parents. Where are - in most cases - their parents that brought them here, illegally. Are they too still here illegally? Is not the rest of immigration law, together with the proposed DACA bills, just a way to gradually make the illegals who brought their kids here LEGAL also? If so, that is surely another major reason to oppose DACA.
Bump!
Saying Hispanics don’t have to obey the law is Hispanic supremacy.
Correct: should be removed from the bench.
This DACA thing sunsets on March 5th. Then IMO Trump will start rounding up the dreamers and quietly deporting them. These judges will be powerless.
Another black-robe fascist traitor who needs to be removed from the bench by Congress and sent to prison for sedition.
Democrats are guilty of using WMD against American citizen taxpayers in the form of illegal immigration to decimate political opposition to their Orwellian vision of a Utopian obamanation.
Thanks jazusamo. He's deciding whether Trump's constitutional powers are Constitutional based on non-Constitutional considerations and partisan bias. He is unfit for the bench, and should be removed.
I wonder how much Bill Clinton was "paid" in donations or 'trades' to inject this number of communist types into our judicial system?
I suspect it was a lot.
Both he and she started outed out with basically nothing and by the time they left the WH they were well heeled.
Politics makes way too many millionaires.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.